Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Story September 1, 1813

Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger

Norfolk, Virginia

What is this article about?

In a New York Justice's Court trial, tenant Woolbridge defended against rent claim by Simers for a Cherry Street house, arguing it was haunted by ghosts making it untenantable. Plaintiff knew of the reputation but didn't disclose. Jury awarded $10 for partial occupancy before ghosts drove them out.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

From the New-York Commercial Advertiser.

CUROUS TRIAL.

Justice's Court.

Simers,

Sampson for Plaintiff.

vs.

Woolbridge.

Authon for defendant.

The cause was tried in the Justice's Court yesterday before a jury.

The Plaintiff claimed a quarter's rent of a house in Cherry street, due the 1st inst. amounting to forty two dollars, or thereabouts.

The defence was, that the house was haunted by ghosts, and, therefore, untenantable by man.

The defendant proved, that he hired and took possession of the house on the 1st of May, not knowing it had the reputation of being inhabited by supernatural beings: that soon after, a lighted candle, placed on a mantlepiece, went out without any assignable cause! That on being again lighted, it went out in a similar way!! That a third attempt terminated in the same manner with this addition, that on the extinguishment of the candle, the witness, who was the person holding it, was violently seized by the arm (by an invisible hand) and turned completely around !!! That the family was alarmed by such unaccountable events, and also by finding, in closets about the house, and elsewhere, "dead men's bones," and understanding that the house had the reputation of being haunted before the family went in, and while unoccupied, the defendant had deserted the house, because his family, not fond of having co-tenants of such a description, could not live in it with peace and without fear.

It appears that the plaintiff, before he hired the house to defendant, knew the reputation of his house, but did not communicate it to the tenant. Some witnesses deposed, that while the house was unoccupied, they had several times observed a "blue flame" on the same mantle-piece, which, though it continued burning, communicated no light to the windows—that this attracted the attention of people passing, gathering numbers of spectators about the house, and fixed upon it the reputation of a haunted house.

The jury retired under the charge of the court, and returned with a verdict of ten dollars, as a compensation to plaintiff for the time defendant had occupied the house, before he was routed by the ghosts!!!

What sub-type of article is it?

Curiosity Ghost Story Historical Event

What themes does it cover?

Deception Justice Misfortune

What keywords are associated?

Haunted House Ghost Trial Rent Dispute Supernatural Events Invisible Hand Dead Men's Bones

What entities or persons were involved?

Simers Woolbridge Sampson Authon

Where did it happen?

Cherry Street, New York

Story Details

Key Persons

Simers Woolbridge Sampson Authon

Location

Cherry Street, New York

Event Date

1st Of May To 1st Inst., Tried Yesterday

Story Details

Tenant Woolbridge vacated haunted house after ghostly incidents like self-extinguishing candle and invisible hand; plaintiff Simers knew of haunt but didn't disclose; jury awarded partial rent.

Are you sure?