Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Henderson Daily Dispatch
Domestic News November 1, 1933

Henderson Daily Dispatch

Henderson, Vance County, North Carolina

What is this article about?

Utility company representatives met with the city council's street committee to discuss removing poles and wires from Garnett Street during upcoming repaving. The power company promised cooperation, while the telephone company proposed a five-year plan for underground wires, which was rejected. Petitions for street widening gathered over 3,000 signatures.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

ASSOCIATED PRESS AND CENTRAL PRESS

Utilities Men Discuss Removal Of Poles, Wires From Main Street Here

Carolina Power and Light Company Representative Promises To Cooperate With City

TELEPHONE HEAD OFFERS OWN PLAN

Mr. Porter Wants Five Years To Put His Wires Underground; No Conclusion Is Reached Other Than Reiteration of Council's Demand for Removal

Representatives of the Carolina Power and Light Company and of the Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company met Tuesday afternoon with the street committee of the City Council and had a lengthy discussion of plans for the removal of poles and wires from Garnett street when the street is repaved in the near future by the State Highway Commission with Federal road funds.

The result of the meeting was a reiteration of the Council's attitude expressed in an ordinance six weeks ago requiring poles and wires to be removed from the street when the paving work is done.

Andrew Monroe, of Raleigh, represents the Carolina Power and Light Company, and J. R. Porter, of Tarboro, executive vice-president of the Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company spoke for his company.

Mr. Monroe, according to Mayor Irving B. Watkins, made some suggestions for the lighting fixtures, including the pedestals and the standards, recommending a plan somewhat like that in use in Goldsboro, but finally promised the utmost cooperation by his company in whatever plan the city finally adopts. It was brought out that 80 percent of the costs of a viaduct would be paid for by the power company and the rest by the city.

Mr. Porter requested that the telephone company be allowed to set its poles and wires back to whatever point the sidewalks are narrowed to permit of the widening of the street, and promised to put in the conduits now and to put the wires underground in not later than five years.

The Council Committee would not hear to such a plan.

The meeting served the purpose of further laying the groundwork for a procedure.

Meanwhile, petitions being circulated in the city are gathering hundreds of additional signatures to be presented to the State Highway Commission asking that the Street be widened, and it is believed that more than 3,000 persons have signed.

The street committee of the Council is composed of Mayor Watkins, Aldermen K. L. Burton, D. C. Loughlin and Henry T. Powell, with W. M. Coffin, street superintendent, cooperating.

What sub-type of article is it?

Infrastructure Politics

What keywords are associated?

Utility Poles Removal Garnett Street Repaving City Council Meeting Street Widening Petitions Underground Wires

What entities or persons were involved?

Andrew Monroe J. R. Porter Mayor Irving B. Watkins K. L. Burton D. C. Loughlin Henry T. Powell W. M. Coffin

Where did it happen?

Garnett Street

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Garnett Street

Event Date

Tuesday Afternoon

Key Persons

Andrew Monroe J. R. Porter Mayor Irving B. Watkins K. L. Burton D. C. Loughlin Henry T. Powell W. M. Coffin

Outcome

no conclusion reached other than reiteration of council's demand for removal; petitions gathering more than 3,000 signatures for street widening

Event Details

Representatives of Carolina Power and Light Company and Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company met with city council's street committee to discuss removal of poles and wires from Garnett street ahead of repaving by State Highway Commission. Power company promises cooperation; telephone company proposes five-year underground plan, rejected by committee.

Are you sure?