Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
June 1, 1829
Lynchburg Virginian
Lynchburg, Virginia
What is this article about?
Editors defend their impartial publication of election-related articles against criticisms from candidates at Bedford court-house, emphasizing responsibility, fairness, and adherence to hearing both sides.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
We are not terrified by their threats, or abashed by their sneers. The authors of all the articles we have published in relation to all the Candidates are "responsible" men, and from the consequences of their acts. The Editors have not exhibited any disposition to shrink from the consequences of their acts. The Editors are "responsible" for what they say—and when they shall pluck any aristocrat by the beard, they are perfectly willing that he should wrap himself up in his fancied importance, and talk of "responsibility," and all that sort of thing. It has been a convenient wall, from time immemorial, for those whose notions of their own consequence are much more exalted than the opinions of their neighbors justify.
But, we have already written more than we intended when we commenced this article. We could not, however, in relation to the latter part of it, say less, without injustice to our feelings; having heard that we, who had shown favoritism to no party, as Editors, had been coarsely assailed, in that character, by some of the Candidates at Bedford court-house, when we were not present to defend ourselves; and while, too, (strange to tell,) the real authors of their grievances, who were present, and who were known to them, were passed over, sub silentio! We have afforded facilities to every individual of them, whether in favor of his election or opposed to it, to communicate his opinions to the people of the District, and, if attacked, to defend himself. We adhered rigidly to the maxim, "Audi alteram partem." We published every communication that was offered, on both sides, without fee or reward—and yet that did not content the gentlemen. We had been guilty of publishing what others wrote; and, reversing the rule by which just men should be guided, one of the gentlemen boastfully tells what he would have done to us if he had been in the place of another of the Candidates, about whom some "stubborn facts" had been told by one of our correspondents, and a second talks about "responsibility!" We have no desire to wrangle with these gentlemen; but, we would thank them, when they choose to bluster and sneer at our course, to do so in our presence.
But, we have already written more than we intended when we commenced this article. We could not, however, in relation to the latter part of it, say less, without injustice to our feelings; having heard that we, who had shown favoritism to no party, as Editors, had been coarsely assailed, in that character, by some of the Candidates at Bedford court-house, when we were not present to defend ourselves; and while, too, (strange to tell,) the real authors of their grievances, who were present, and who were known to them, were passed over, sub silentio! We have afforded facilities to every individual of them, whether in favor of his election or opposed to it, to communicate his opinions to the people of the District, and, if attacked, to defend himself. We adhered rigidly to the maxim, "Audi alteram partem." We published every communication that was offered, on both sides, without fee or reward—and yet that did not content the gentlemen. We had been guilty of publishing what others wrote; and, reversing the rule by which just men should be guided, one of the gentlemen boastfully tells what he would have done to us if he had been in the place of another of the Candidates, about whom some "stubborn facts" had been told by one of our correspondents, and a second talks about "responsibility!" We have no desire to wrangle with these gentlemen; but, we would thank them, when they choose to bluster and sneer at our course, to do so in our presence.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Editorial Responsibility
Election Candidates
Impartial Publishing
Bedford Court House
Audi Alteram Partem
Press Defense
What entities or persons were involved?
Editors
Candidates
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Editorial Impartiality During Elections
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Assertive
Key Figures
Editors
Candidates
Key Arguments
Editors Are Responsible For Published Articles And Willing To Face Consequences
No Favoritism Shown To Any Party In Publications
Candidates Assailed Editors In Their Absence At Bedford Court House
Facilities Afforded To All Candidates To Communicate Opinions And Defend Themselves
Adhered To Maxim 'Audi Alteram Partem' By Publishing Communications From Both Sides Without Fee
Candidates Dissatisfied Despite Impartiality And Threatened Responsibility