Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
December 31, 1929
Las Vegas Age
Las Vegas, Clark County, Lincoln County, Nevada
What is this article about?
Editorial discusses Arizona's commitment to the Phoenix Conference on Colorado River development, urging cooperation on the Boulder Dam project despite past opposition, emphasizing that federal government will proceed regardless, restoring public confidence.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
THE PHOENIX CONFERENCE.
IT IS GRATIFYING to know that Arizona has at last definitely committed herself to joining in another tri-state conference.
Whether or not an agreement shall be reached we cannot predict. Arizona's position in the past has seemed to be based on illogical premises. It may be that those in the other States of the Colorado River basin to be present Arizona state administration may think best for their state to follow the views and policies of their predecessors.
But the important thing is that Arizona has consented to join in this last effort to bring understanding between the states on the problems of developing the Colorado river. Should an agreement be reached, all well and good. We would have occasion to celebrate such a happy ending to a long drawn controversy.
But should Arizona still maintain her former position of opposition to the Boulder Dam project on which the future prosperity of the whole southwest depends she will alienate from herself to a large degree the good will of her sister states on which much of her own welfare depends.
AND, this is the important point, the government will proceed with the building of the Boulder Dam project just as swiftly and surely without Arizona's cooperation as with it. A little annoyance and possibly, though not probably, a little delay might result from her opposition. But the clouds of uncertainty would be cleared from the sky and public confidence in the construction of Boulder Dam project would be restored.
Had Arizona during the years she has opposed Boulder Dam had any means to defeat it she would have used them. She placed every possible obstacle in the way of the project during the years in which the legislation was in its formative stages.
In spite of that opposition, the administration at Washington was won over, Congress passed the bill by an overwhelming majority. The country as a whole adopted the project as its own.
Arizona, having been unable to wreck the project in its formative stages, notwithstanding that she used every possible means to do so, it is impossible to believe that she can defeat or delay it now after it has become a fixed policy of the government duly enacted into law.
IT IS GRATIFYING to know that Arizona has at last definitely committed herself to joining in another tri-state conference.
Whether or not an agreement shall be reached we cannot predict. Arizona's position in the past has seemed to be based on illogical premises. It may be that those in the other States of the Colorado River basin to be present Arizona state administration may think best for their state to follow the views and policies of their predecessors.
But the important thing is that Arizona has consented to join in this last effort to bring understanding between the states on the problems of developing the Colorado river. Should an agreement be reached, all well and good. We would have occasion to celebrate such a happy ending to a long drawn controversy.
But should Arizona still maintain her former position of opposition to the Boulder Dam project on which the future prosperity of the whole southwest depends she will alienate from herself to a large degree the good will of her sister states on which much of her own welfare depends.
AND, this is the important point, the government will proceed with the building of the Boulder Dam project just as swiftly and surely without Arizona's cooperation as with it. A little annoyance and possibly, though not probably, a little delay might result from her opposition. But the clouds of uncertainty would be cleared from the sky and public confidence in the construction of Boulder Dam project would be restored.
Had Arizona during the years she has opposed Boulder Dam had any means to defeat it she would have used them. She placed every possible obstacle in the way of the project during the years in which the legislation was in its formative stages.
In spite of that opposition, the administration at Washington was won over, Congress passed the bill by an overwhelming majority. The country as a whole adopted the project as its own.
Arizona, having been unable to wreck the project in its formative stages, notwithstanding that she used every possible means to do so, it is impossible to believe that she can defeat or delay it now after it has become a fixed policy of the government duly enacted into law.
What sub-type of article is it?
Infrastructure
Economic Policy
What keywords are associated?
Phoenix Conference
Colorado River
Boulder Dam
Arizona Opposition
Tri State Agreement
Southwest Prosperity
Federal Project
What entities or persons were involved?
Arizona
Colorado River Basin States
Boulder Dam Project
Washington Administration
Congress
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Arizona's Role In Phoenix Conference And Boulder Dam Project
Stance / Tone
Urging Cooperation And Warning Against Futile Opposition
Key Figures
Arizona
Colorado River Basin States
Boulder Dam Project
Washington Administration
Congress
Key Arguments
Arizona's Past Opposition Based On Illogical Premises
Conference Is Last Effort For State Understanding On Colorado River Development
Agreement Would End Long Controversy
Continued Opposition Alienates Sister States And Harms Arizona's Welfare
Federal Government Will Build Boulder Dam Without Arizona's Cooperation
Arizona Failed To Block Project In Legislative Stages Despite Efforts
Project Now Fixed Government Policy