Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Daily National Whig
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
Editorial commentary refuting claims that Robert C. Winthrop's election as Speaker compromises the South, noting Southern acquiescence and abolitionists' refusal to vote for him.
OCR Quality
Full Text
If Mr. Winthrop's election to the Speakership be so prejudicial to the South as Mr. Ritchie supposes, pray, how does he account for the refusal of Messrs. Palfrey, Giddings, and Tuck to vote for Mr. Winthrop?
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Key Persons
Outcome
election of mr. winthrop as speaker; refusal of messrs. palfrey, giddings, and tuck to vote for him.
Event Details
The Union claims the South is compromised by Mr. Winthrop's election as Speaker, but the text dismisses this, pointing out Mr. Holmes of South Carolina's acquiescence by not voting against him, suggesting Winthrop is friendly to the South like Mr. Ritchie. It questions why anti-Southern figures like Palfrey, Giddings, and Tuck refused to vote for Winthrop if he harms the South.