Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 18, 1872
The Cairo Daily Bulletin
Cairo, Alexander County, Illinois
What is this article about?
The editorial, likely from the Bulletin, defends its lenient criticism of President Grant against the Shawneetown Mercury's implication of harshness. It lists factual charges like nepotism and indifference to duties while praising Grant as a soldier.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Now that Mr. Greeley has grown so tender-hearted, can he not be prevailed upon to say fewer hard things about General Grant? -Shawneetown Mercury.
The 'Mercury' has not followed the Bulletin in its treatment of Grant. We believe no Liberal paper in the country has dealt more leniently with the President than this journal. We have said as little as possible in condemnation of him, and the 'Mercury' has not denied one of our charges. We have said he has appointed men to office who had given him valuable presents, and seemingly for that reason alone: that his relatives have nearly all been allowed to get to the public teat: that he has manifested a stolid indifference, which looked like ignorance, to his duties and the constitution and the laws: that he has elevated to office red-handed traitors and put out of office loyal men for no good reason, and have made other charges susceptible of as clear proof: but we have not abused Grant-have said he was a very good because a very successful soldier, and that he would be guilty of fewer crimes against the public weal if he were not utterly ignorant of the principles of our government.
How much less would the 'Mercury' have us say than this --how much less could we say and not be guilty of a neglect of our duty as a truthful journalist? The 'Mercury' has not done us justice in this matter, and we ask it to withdraw the charge which by implication it has made in the sentence above quoted.
The 'Mercury' has not followed the Bulletin in its treatment of Grant. We believe no Liberal paper in the country has dealt more leniently with the President than this journal. We have said as little as possible in condemnation of him, and the 'Mercury' has not denied one of our charges. We have said he has appointed men to office who had given him valuable presents, and seemingly for that reason alone: that his relatives have nearly all been allowed to get to the public teat: that he has manifested a stolid indifference, which looked like ignorance, to his duties and the constitution and the laws: that he has elevated to office red-handed traitors and put out of office loyal men for no good reason, and have made other charges susceptible of as clear proof: but we have not abused Grant-have said he was a very good because a very successful soldier, and that he would be guilty of fewer crimes against the public weal if he were not utterly ignorant of the principles of our government.
How much less would the 'Mercury' have us say than this --how much less could we say and not be guilty of a neglect of our duty as a truthful journalist? The 'Mercury' has not done us justice in this matter, and we ask it to withdraw the charge which by implication it has made in the sentence above quoted.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Grant Criticism
Liberal Press
Presidential Appointments
Nepotism
Political Indifference
Journalistic Duty
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Greeley
General Grant
Shawneetown Mercury
Bulletin
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Lenient Criticism Of President Grant
Stance / Tone
Defensive Justification Of Factual Reporting
Key Figures
Mr. Greeley
General Grant
Shawneetown Mercury
Bulletin
Key Arguments
Journal Has Been Lenient Toward Grant Compared To Other Liberal Papers
Charges Include Appointing Gift Givers To Office
Relatives Accessing Public Funds
Indifference To Duties, Constitution, And Laws
Elevating Traitors And Removing Loyal Men
Grant Praised As Successful Soldier But Ignorant Of Government Principles
Cannot Say Less Without Neglecting Journalistic Duty