Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 9, 1855
Washington Telegraph
Washington, Hempstead County, Arkansas
What is this article about?
An English aristocrat's opinion, relayed via a New Yorker to the Courier and Enquirer, criticizes Britain's weakened military and naval state post-Crimean War, its subservience to France, inconsistencies in foreign policy regarding territories like Crimea and Poland, and warns of impending revolution at home.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
An Englishman's Opinion.—An Englishman in New York sends to the Courier and Enquirer, the subjoined article, stating that it was from one of the coolest heads in England—a member of the aristocracy, and of a family which for antiquity and public service has no superior in that country.
The extract reads thus:
"You of America know that we have no army and now no General; that we have a raw militia, at present useless, a great want of sailors, and a very discontented public, their brutal voice crying out for more victims, now when the Russian power in the Black Sea is paralyzed for many years to come. It must be strange to the intelligent regard of foreign countries, that we should, confessedly play second fiddle with perfect complacency, allow our marrow to be sucked out by France, in destroying the naval power of our natural friend in the Mediterranean. The eyes of other nations must be closed, not to observe with distrust the two great naval powers of the world, joined to dictate, and the possessors of Gibraltar and Malta, distrusting the holder of Sevastopol, declaring that the acquisition of the Crimea is unjust, while Algiers is a French possession! We may expect a row about Poland, but what is to be done with Hungary? We gave away Norway, and now are taking back Finland! Europe will either be under the power of a Napoleon, including England, or must become one vast Federal power.
I cannot say that the mob arguments are inconsistent with Republican, or rather Democratic propagandism; but they are inconsistent with a French or German alliance: and if such opinions may govern our foreign office, no peace can be made in which we are not silenced; for we have now demonstrated that we are scarcely a third rate power as a military nation.
"In our external policy we want a thrashing, having offended Heaven in our swagger: while at home every sign speaks but too significantly of revolution."
The extract reads thus:
"You of America know that we have no army and now no General; that we have a raw militia, at present useless, a great want of sailors, and a very discontented public, their brutal voice crying out for more victims, now when the Russian power in the Black Sea is paralyzed for many years to come. It must be strange to the intelligent regard of foreign countries, that we should, confessedly play second fiddle with perfect complacency, allow our marrow to be sucked out by France, in destroying the naval power of our natural friend in the Mediterranean. The eyes of other nations must be closed, not to observe with distrust the two great naval powers of the world, joined to dictate, and the possessors of Gibraltar and Malta, distrusting the holder of Sevastopol, declaring that the acquisition of the Crimea is unjust, while Algiers is a French possession! We may expect a row about Poland, but what is to be done with Hungary? We gave away Norway, and now are taking back Finland! Europe will either be under the power of a Napoleon, including England, or must become one vast Federal power.
I cannot say that the mob arguments are inconsistent with Republican, or rather Democratic propagandism; but they are inconsistent with a French or German alliance: and if such opinions may govern our foreign office, no peace can be made in which we are not silenced; for we have now demonstrated that we are scarcely a third rate power as a military nation.
"In our external policy we want a thrashing, having offended Heaven in our swagger: while at home every sign speaks but too significantly of revolution."
What sub-type of article is it?
Foreign Affairs
Military Affairs
War Or Peace
What keywords are associated?
British Foreign Policy
Crimean War Aftermath
Military Weakness
European Alliances
Domestic Revolution
What entities or persons were involved?
England
France
Russia
Napoleon
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Britain's Weakened Foreign And Military Position Post Crimean War
Stance / Tone
Critical Of British Policy And Warning Of Revolution
Key Figures
England
France
Russia
Napoleon
Key Arguments
Britain Has No Army, Raw Militia, Lack Of Sailors, And Discontented Public
Britain Plays Second Fiddle To France, Destroying Naval Power Of Natural Friend In Mediterranean
Inconsistencies In Policy On Crimea, Sevastopol, Algiers, Poland, Hungary, Norway, Finland
Europe Faces Domination By Napoleon Or Federal Union
Mob Arguments Inconsistent With French Or German Alliance, Leading To Silenced Peace
Britain Demonstrated As Third Rate Military Power
External Policy Invites Thrashing; Internal Signs Of Revolution