Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Marion Daily Mirror
Editorial July 2, 1910

The Marion Daily Mirror

Marion, Marion County, Ohio

What is this article about?

Robert G. Ingersoll denounces whipping children as wrong, vividly describing the emotional toll and urging parents to foster happy, honest homes instead.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

The Rod and the Child.

I do not believe in the government of the lash. If any one of you ever expects to whip your children again I want you to have a photograph taken of yourself when you are in the act, with your face red with vulgar anger and the face of the little child, with eyes swimming in tears and the little chin dimpled with fear, like a piece of water struck by a sudden cold wind. Have the picture taken. If that little child should die I cannot think of a sweeter way to spend an autumn afternoon than to go out to the cemetery when the maples are clad in tender gold and little scarlet runners are coming, like poems of regret, from the sad heart of the earth and sit down upon the grave and look at that photograph and think of the flesh, now dust, that you beat. I tell you it is wrong; it is no way to raise children. Make your home happy. Be honest with them. Divide fairly with them in everything.—Robert G. Ingersoll

What sub-type of article is it?

Moral Or Religious Social Reform

What keywords are associated?

Corporal Punishment Child Rearing Moral Reform Family Happiness Physical Discipline

What entities or persons were involved?

Robert G. Ingersoll

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Opposition To Corporal Punishment For Children

Stance / Tone

Strongly Against Physical Discipline, Advocating Kindness And Honesty

Key Figures

Robert G. Ingersoll

Key Arguments

Government Of The Lash Is Wrong Whipping Children Causes Vulgar Anger And Fear Imagine The Horror Through A Photograph Of The Act Beating Leads To Regret Over A Child's Grave Raise Children By Making Home Happy And Dividing Fairly

Are you sure?