Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Gold Hill Daily News
Domestic News June 14, 1881

Gold Hill Daily News

Gold Hill, Storey County, Nevada

What is this article about?

The New York Times criticizes ex-President Ulysses S. Grant for his recent political statements, describing them as degrading and focused on personal gain rather than public affairs, shaming former supporters.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Ex-President Grant Receives
Deserved Castigation.
New York, June 14.—The Times says:
When General Grant was known as the
silent man, "we all thought him wise,
but he talks this year, and his talk is
not creditable to him nor those who have
honored him. It is very difficult to con-
ceive of a lower or more degrading con-
ception of public affairs than that which
Grant seems from his talk to have. Ap-
parently, he conceives that the sole ob-
ject of a political party is to put some
individuals into the enjoyment of fat
office, and that the Republican party
ought to have no higher aim in life than
to bow at the feet of U. S. Grant and
Roscoe Conkling. Never before have
personal politics been pushed to such
disgusting lengths as the conversations
of the ex-President. There are many
thousand sensible people in this coun-
try who voted for Grant and favored his
nomination last year, but who confess
the fact with shame today. The num-
ber of people who think him fit for civil
office is not increasing since he began to
talk.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Grant Criticism Political Talk Republican Party New York Times

What entities or persons were involved?

U. S. Grant Roscoe Conkling

Where did it happen?

New York

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

New York

Event Date

June 14

Key Persons

U. S. Grant Roscoe Conkling

Event Details

The Times criticizes ex-President Grant's recent talks as not creditable, portraying a degrading view of public affairs focused on personal office-seeking and Republican party subservience to Grant and Conkling, leading to shame among former supporters.

Are you sure?