Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 16, 1856
Nashville Daily Patriot
Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee
What is this article about?
The Rochester Advertiser criticizes the Washington Union for feigned impartiality in the Democratic presidential nomination, accusing it of biased support for President Pierce's re-nomination via an editorial that falsifies Free Soilers' stance on the Kansas Act and insults non-intervention Democrats as 'spoils-loving.'
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Washington Union professes to stand impartial between the claims of candidates for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. The Rochester Advertiser thus exposes the hollow pretense:
As a sample of its entire partiality, The Union on Friday last published an editorial, covering more than a column in its ample pages, professedly devoted to a discussion of the question of availability, but in truth to the support of the claims of President Pierce to a re-nomination. In the prosecution of this "labor of love," the position of the Free Soilers of New York and of the North was recklessly falsified—by boldly and mendaciously assuming that they were and are firm and consistent supporters of the Kansas act, when the reverse is known to be true. But not contented with this, that same paper stigmatized the true supporters of the non-intervention policy as "spoils-loving Democrats," thus adding insult to injury, and the more dastardly because of the pretense of entire impartiality as to candidates!
As a sample of its entire partiality, The Union on Friday last published an editorial, covering more than a column in its ample pages, professedly devoted to a discussion of the question of availability, but in truth to the support of the claims of President Pierce to a re-nomination. In the prosecution of this "labor of love," the position of the Free Soilers of New York and of the North was recklessly falsified—by boldly and mendaciously assuming that they were and are firm and consistent supporters of the Kansas act, when the reverse is known to be true. But not contented with this, that same paper stigmatized the true supporters of the non-intervention policy as "spoils-loving Democrats," thus adding insult to injury, and the more dastardly because of the pretense of entire impartiality as to candidates!
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Democratic Nomination
President Pierce
Washington Union
Kansas Act
Free Soilers
Non Intervention Policy
What entities or persons were involved?
Washington Union
Rochester Advertiser
President Pierce
Free Soilers
Democrats
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Washington Union's Bias In Democratic Nomination
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical Of Newspaper Partiality
Key Figures
Washington Union
Rochester Advertiser
President Pierce
Free Soilers
Democrats
Key Arguments
Union's Editorial Pretends Impartiality But Supports Pierce's Re Nomination
Falsifies Free Soilers' Opposition To Kansas Act As Support
Insults Non Intervention Supporters As 'Spoils Loving Democrats'