Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Daily Morning Journal And Courier
Domestic News April 4, 1905

The Daily Morning Journal And Courier

New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut

What is this article about?

Board of aldermen meeting in April: adopted revised ordinances, referred street petition, sustained mayor's veto on bridge damages payment, tabled monument appropriation, and placed voting machines in Fifth and Tenth wards.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

FIFTH WARD GETS MACHINES
ALDERNMEN VOTE A CHANGE IN LOCATION.

First Ward Will Have None—Mayor's Veto of Kimberly Avenue Bridge Damages Order Sustained—Revised Ordinances Adopted.

The regular meeting of the board of aldermen for April was held last evening. City Clerk Norris submitted a communication proposing the adoption of the ordinances in the revised form submitted by him be accepted. The board voted to do so. The ordinances as accepted last evening form a complete compilation of the ordinances as previously revised and adopted by the board. The petition of James Hillhouse for a layout of streets on the Hillhouse property which it gives in full in another column was referred to the committee on streets. Mayor Studley submitted his veto of the order passed by the board on March 6, ordering the payment of damages assessed as a result of the construction of the Kimberly avenue bridge. The mayor assigned as reasons for his veto, first, that there was no appropriation out of which the damages could be paid, and second, because the mayor considers that the sum assessed is excessive. The veto was sustained. A petition for an additional appropriation of $450 for the Soldiers' monument, which is to be erected in Broadway, was laid on the table. Alderman Langley advocated a reconsideration of the former vote on the placing of the voting machines. Alderman Langley was opposed to the selection of the wards in which the machines are to be placed. The motion was carried. Alderman Spreyer proposed the placing of one machine each in the First, Third, Fifth, Seventh and Ninth wards using them in conjunction with the ballot box. Alderman Langley moved that two be placed in the Fifth ward, the remaining in the Tenth. An amendment to place ballot boxes in the wards with the machines was lost. The motion of Alderman Langley was carried 5 to 4. So the machines will now be placed two in the Fifth and three in the Tenth ward.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Board Of Aldermen Revised Ordinances Mayor Veto Kimberly Avenue Bridge Soldiers Monument Voting Machines Fifth Ward Tenth Ward

What entities or persons were involved?

City Clerk Norris James Hillhouse Mayor Studley Alderman Langley Alderman Spreyer

Domestic News Details

Event Date

Last Evening In April

Key Persons

City Clerk Norris James Hillhouse Mayor Studley Alderman Langley Alderman Spreyer

Outcome

ordinances adopted in revised form; petition for street layout referred to committee; mayor's veto of damages order for kimberly avenue bridge sustained; petition for $450 appropriation for soldiers' monument laid on table; voting machines placement revised to two in fifth ward and three in tenth ward.

Event Details

The regular meeting of the board of aldermen for April was held last evening. City Clerk Norris proposed adoption of revised ordinances, which the board accepted. Petition of James Hillhouse for street layout on his property referred to streets committee. Mayor Studley vetoed order for payment of damages from Kimberly avenue bridge construction due to no appropriation and excessive sum; veto sustained. Petition for additional $450 for Soldiers' monument in Broadway laid on table. Alderman Langley advocated reconsideration of voting machines placement; motion carried. Alderman Spreyer proposed one machine each in First, Third, Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth wards with ballot boxes; opposed. Alderman Langley's motion for two in Fifth ward and remaining in Tenth ward carried 5 to 4; amendment for ballot boxes lost.

Are you sure?