Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freePhenix Gazette
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
The sentences from a Naval Court Martial for Commodore David Porter, Lieutenant Hunter, and Lieutenant Whitlock are published in Washington papers. Porter was suspended for six months, Hunter acquitted of neglect of duty, and Whitlock suspended for two years without pay. The report expresses disappointment in Porter's sentence.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Commodore Porter was found guilty upon each of the charges and specifications, and sentenced to be suspended for six months.—
Lieut. Hunter was acquitted, the charge being neglect of duty, for permitting a foreigner, by the name of Madrid, to be received on board the Franklin, without informing the Commanding Officer. Lieut. Whitlock was tried for neglect of duty, (sleeping on his watch at different times) and found guilty.— He was sentenced to two years suspension, without pay or emoluments. We feel no disposition to charge the members of the Court with any unfriendly feeling towards the gallant Porter: doubtless they discharged their duty conscientiously, but we cannot refrain from expressing our disappointment and regret.— We think the sentence harsh and unmerited— at least upon the first charge—and we sincerely trust it will not have the slightest tendency either to impair the patriotic zeal of that useful and distinguished officer, or to sink him in the estimation of his admiring countrymen.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Domestic News Details
Key Persons
Outcome
commodore porter sentenced to six months suspension; lieut. hunter acquitted; lieut. whitlock sentenced to two years suspension without pay or emoluments.
Event Details
Sentences of the Naval Court Martial promulgated through Washington papers. Porter found guilty on all charges and specifications. Hunter acquitted of neglect of duty for allowing foreigner Madrid aboard the Franklin without informing commanding officer. Whitlock found guilty of neglect of duty by sleeping on watch and sentenced accordingly. Editorial expresses disappointment in Porter's sentence, viewing it as harsh and unmerited on the first charge.