Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
July 2, 1835
Martinsburg Gazette
Martinsburg, Berkeley County, West Virginia
What is this article about?
Editorial criticizes the U.S. President's frequent and inappropriate use of the veto power, citing a letter from R. T. Lytle detailing the President's determination to veto any bill admitting Michigan as a state before resolving the Ohio-Michigan boundary dispute.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The Veto,—We have lately had occasion to advert to the free use by the Executive of the Veto power, in cases not calling for it. Since doing so, we have further evidence, in the following fact, of the familiarity with which he is disposed to avail himself of that extreme and extraordinary power.
Among the documents recently laid before the Legislature of Ohio, by the Governor of that State, is a letter from R. T. Lytle, Esq, late Representative in Congress, dated from this city, March 14th, in which, speaking of the boundary question between Ohio and Michigan (or the United States), the writer speaks of a conversation which he and Mr. Hamer had that morning had with the President upon the subject: and says:
"The President has determined to make this a prominent point in his next message—and in answer to our apprehensions as to the probable admission of Michigan into the Union, by a coalition (the result of a common jealousy) between the Northern and Southern States against Ohio, without a settlement of this question, he declared his fixed determination to apply the veto to any bill which should make it a State before the settlement of the boundary difficulty."—Nat. Int.
Among the documents recently laid before the Legislature of Ohio, by the Governor of that State, is a letter from R. T. Lytle, Esq, late Representative in Congress, dated from this city, March 14th, in which, speaking of the boundary question between Ohio and Michigan (or the United States), the writer speaks of a conversation which he and Mr. Hamer had that morning had with the President upon the subject: and says:
"The President has determined to make this a prominent point in his next message—and in answer to our apprehensions as to the probable admission of Michigan into the Union, by a coalition (the result of a common jealousy) between the Northern and Southern States against Ohio, without a settlement of this question, he declared his fixed determination to apply the veto to any bill which should make it a State before the settlement of the boundary difficulty."—Nat. Int.
What sub-type of article is it?
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Veto Power
Ohio Michigan Boundary
State Admission
Presidential Veto
Executive Power
What entities or persons were involved?
President
R. T. Lytle
Mr. Hamer
Governor Of Ohio
Legislature Of Ohio
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Presidential Veto On Michigan Statehood Due To Ohio Boundary Dispute
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Excessive Veto Use By The Executive
Key Figures
President
R. T. Lytle
Mr. Hamer
Governor Of Ohio
Legislature Of Ohio
Key Arguments
Executive's Frequent Use Of Veto Power In Unnecessary Cases
President's Intent To Highlight Ohio Michigan Boundary In Next Message
President's Determination To Veto Michigan Admission Bill Without Boundary Settlement
Apprehensions Of Northern Southern Coalition Against Ohio