Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Enquirer
Richmond, Henrico County, Virginia
What is this article about?
This editorial critiques a recent report adopted by the Massachusetts Legislature, portraying it as a biased, factious document produced amid partisan passions. It anticipates the report's exaggeration of French aggressions while ignoring British ones, such as the Chesapeake outrage and Orders in Council, and promises further analysis.
OCR Quality
Full Text
Let us consider the man, by whom this document was written—the body that adopted it—the place and season, at which it was conceived—and the purposes for which it is ushered into light—The world will duly put all these circumstances together; and will not fail to enquire, whether reason can be expected from such passions, and truth from such prejudice? But take this composition as it is, and test by its own merits only. The result will probably demonstrate, that the means which have been employed, are not less feeble and false, than the motives of this literary achievement are vile, factious and contemptible.
Judging from the views of the party who conceived it, and the times in which it was produced, what would any candid man expect on such an occasion? He would expect, that all the aggressions of France would be depicted in most horrible caricature—that the multiplied insults and wrongs of G. Britain would be sunk in oblivion—that the impressment of our seamen, the murder of Pierce, the burning of the Philadelphia, the outrage on the Chesapeake, the wrongs of the Orders in Council, the late rejection of all our propositions, would be buried in silence—that no resentment, no indignation, no resistance would be shewn to their favorite Britain—that all our rage should be turned against France—and that Congress would be solemnly invited to "arm our public and private ships" against France only, "and unfurl the republican banner against the imperial standard"—Such, to the precise character of this garbled Report—Such is the general spirit, which runs through it.
Strictures on this Report—in our next.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Biased Massachusetts Legislature Report On Foreign Aggressions
Stance / Tone
Strongly Critical Of Partisan Bias Favoring Britain
Key Figures
Key Arguments