Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe Nome Daily Nugget
Nome, Nome County, Alaska
What is this article about?
The New York American editorial defends the U.S. Navy against criticism in Virginia's 'The Galaxy' periodical, which misrepresented a 1911 gunnery exercise. It clarifies that the USS New Hampshire sank the old battleship Texas (San Marcos) with live ammunition in under three minutes from six miles, while other ships used non-explosive shells, and the wreck aids training.
OCR Quality
Full Text
This little periodical, published at a great seaport, positively declares that two and one-half millions of dollars worth of ammunition has been fired by the American navy at the old battle-ship Texas as a target, and that the old Texas still survives and will continue to survive, and sneers at the American navy in that, firing two and one-half millions in ammunition at a single unresponsive battleship it fails to destroy it, and wonders how long it would take the American navy to destroy one live battleship of an active enemy. It is in this way that one young scribbler, with his pen and ink, can injure the navy at the time when it most needs friends.
This young man is utterly ignorant of the fact that only one ship, the New Hampshire, used war ammunition against the Texas when it was made a target. The remaining ships used non-explosive shells. He is utterly ignorant of the fact that less than three minutes after the order was given to commence firing the New Hampshire, on March 17, 1911, at a distance of six miles, smashed the old Texas, now called the San Marcos, to smithereens and sank her just as far as it was possible for her to sink in the shallow water in which she had been placed, so as to save her decks. Nor does he realize the facilities of naval gunnery by which this old vessel can be utilized for years to come in the training of young officers and gun pointers in spotting and calibration.
- N. Y. American.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of American Navy Against Periodical Criticism
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Navy, Critical Of The Galaxy
Key Figures
Key Arguments