Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 15, 1840
The New England Weekly Review
Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut
What is this article about?
The newspaper defends reprinting an editorial from the Boston Evening Chronicle criticizing hotels like Worcester House and Tontine in New Haven, attributing it to Rufus W. Griswold. It asserts no malice, calls for verification of charges, and upholds its independent stance on public matters.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Hotels.
We copied last week part of an Editorial article from the Boston Evening Chronicle, reflecting in no very mild manner upon certain Hotels between Boston and New York, among which were named the Worcester House, and the Tontine, N. Haven. We had not the least unkind feeling towards either of these establishments, in copying the article, for if we had, we should have transferred the whole of it to our columns without comment. But on the contrary, we noticed it as an item of news and wherein we thought the writer exhibited malice or ill-feeling, we avoided noticing. The Chronicle is a paper lately commenced under the direction of Rufus W. Griswold, the former publisher of the Brother Jonathan, and late of the New World, and we supposed his reflections upon the Hotels to be just and merited, or we should not have noticed them. We specifically stated in our remarks, that 'the charges are very serious,' and so we think them, but we also said, that 'if they were true, out with them,' and we say so again. If the charges are false, Mr. Griswold is liable to be held to account before a proper tribunal, but if they can be proved to be true, Mr. Griswold is in the right, and will be sustained in expressing his opinion as he did, by all lovers of good order and society. We do not profess to know any thing about the Hotels, we have made no charge against either of them, and of course, have none to withdraw. When we speak either for or against a Hotel, or indeed any other matter of public concern, we do it without regard to fear or favor. Our course has been, and always shall be, so long as we stand between individuals and the public, FREE AND INDEPENDENT, untrammelled by favor, and unawed by frowns or threats. We mean to do right, and though we make no claims to infallibility, yet we believe we hit as near the mark, as those who would line our conduct.
We copied last week part of an Editorial article from the Boston Evening Chronicle, reflecting in no very mild manner upon certain Hotels between Boston and New York, among which were named the Worcester House, and the Tontine, N. Haven. We had not the least unkind feeling towards either of these establishments, in copying the article, for if we had, we should have transferred the whole of it to our columns without comment. But on the contrary, we noticed it as an item of news and wherein we thought the writer exhibited malice or ill-feeling, we avoided noticing. The Chronicle is a paper lately commenced under the direction of Rufus W. Griswold, the former publisher of the Brother Jonathan, and late of the New World, and we supposed his reflections upon the Hotels to be just and merited, or we should not have noticed them. We specifically stated in our remarks, that 'the charges are very serious,' and so we think them, but we also said, that 'if they were true, out with them,' and we say so again. If the charges are false, Mr. Griswold is liable to be held to account before a proper tribunal, but if they can be proved to be true, Mr. Griswold is in the right, and will be sustained in expressing his opinion as he did, by all lovers of good order and society. We do not profess to know any thing about the Hotels, we have made no charge against either of them, and of course, have none to withdraw. When we speak either for or against a Hotel, or indeed any other matter of public concern, we do it without regard to fear or favor. Our course has been, and always shall be, so long as we stand between individuals and the public, FREE AND INDEPENDENT, untrammelled by favor, and unawed by frowns or threats. We mean to do right, and though we make no claims to infallibility, yet we believe we hit as near the mark, as those who would line our conduct.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
What keywords are associated?
Hotel Criticisms
Press Freedom
Rufus Griswold
Boston Chronicle
Journalistic Independence
What entities or persons were involved?
Rufus W. Griswold
Boston Evening Chronicle
Worcester House
Tontine N. Haven
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Reprinting Hotel Criticisms And Press Independence
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Assertive Of Journalistic Freedom
Key Figures
Rufus W. Griswold
Boston Evening Chronicle
Worcester House
Tontine N. Haven
Key Arguments
Copied Article Without Malice, As An Item Of News
Supposed Reflections Were Just And Merited
Charges Are Serious; If True, Publish Them; If False, Griswold Accountable
Newspaper Remains Free And Independent On Public Matters