Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Portland Gazette
Editorial March 23, 1819

The Portland Gazette

Portland, Cumberland County, Maine

What is this article about?

Satirical critique of Gen. King's speech defending the use of militia in defense and arguing for federal remuneration, highlighting tensions between state and federal constitutional powers over militia command.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Gen. King's Speech

Has been industriously published and recommended to attention. Novelty is pleasing : and those who heard the Gen. make a speech in the Senate will not on that account be less pleased; for this here "excellent speech." as somebody calls it, is "quite another thing." In words and composition it is almost lively and decent, no more like the General's words and composition on any other occasion, than his face is like the face of a Boston lawyer; and in superficial content, such as we use in measuring boards, as was once said of a speech in Congress. it is a great speech, so big that every one will not have time to read it before the first Monday of April. But, it being important that every voter should know what it is. we extract all the substance of it for immediate use as we take the essence of peppermint to warm us, rather than the whole plant, stalk, leaves and blossoms together.

The whole substance of the whole speech.—Nobody says the militia were not employed in our necessary defence : nobody pretends but that they could have been necessary if all the Law called for by the President had been employed: nobody intimates that there was any want of prudence in the expence : I know that the Division which I had the honour to command cost scarcely one tenth part what regular troops would have cost · nobody supposes but that our claim to remuneration is equitable : no, that's not the point. The State Constitution says the Governor shall be Commander in Chief of all the forces of the State : the Federal Constitution says the President may call out the militia to repel invasion. Now all this means that the President may call them out when he pleases. where he pleases. and as long as he pleases : and the Commander in Chief has no right to a doubt or an opinion respecting his duty in the case If we do not pass a solemn legislative resolve that this is the true plain meaning, Congress will spunkily refuse to pay our claim, however equitable ; and, if we do, I am not quite certain they will pay it; but I rather guess they possibly may.

What sub-type of article is it?

Constitutional Military Affairs Partisan Politics

What keywords are associated?

Gen King Speech Militia Defense Federal Constitution State Commander In Chief Congressional Remuneration Presidential Authority

What entities or persons were involved?

Gen. King President Governor Congress

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Critique Of Gen. King's Speech On Militia And Federal Remuneration

Stance / Tone

Satirical Mockery Of The Speech's Constitutional Argument

Key Figures

Gen. King President Governor Congress

Key Arguments

Militia Were Necessarily Employed In Defense No Imprudence In Expense; Militia Cost Less Than Regulars Claim For Remuneration Is Equitable Federal Constitution Allows President Unlimited Call Of Militia State Governor Has No Discretion In Duty Without Legislative Resolve Affirming This, Congress Will Refuse Payment

Are you sure?