Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
June 10, 1871
The Daily Phoenix
Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina
What is this article about?
Editorial from Columbia, S.C., June 10, 1871, criticizes the New York World's harsh tone toward Jefferson Davis and the Southern 'lost cause,' defending Southern honor and rejecting imposed conditions for Democratic party influence in 1872 elections.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
COLUMBIA, S.C.
Saturday Morning, June 10, 1871.
"And Thou too, O: Brite Tho'e World"
We agree, with our contemporary of the Wilmington Journal, in its strictures upon the tone of temper recently exhibited by the New York World in its reference to ex-President Davis. The World should bear in mind, that when it undertakes to relieve the Democratic party of any responsibility for the political tenets and policy of Mr. Davis, it is not either wise or becoming for it to imitate the Radical press in their usual vituperation of the South, and disregard of Southern sensibilities. The Journal says:
We beg leave, also, to suggest whether the contrast afforded by the utterances of such Republicans as General Sherman, Senator Schurz, and Senator Trumbull, and others, when placed side by side with the following from the New York World, will have a tendency to attract Southern men to the candidate supported and endorsed by the World:
"There is a similarity in one point between the secessionists of this country, under Jefferson Davis, and the Communists of Paris, under their hydra-headed leadership. Both misused, disgraced, and finally desecrated a good idea.
"The creed which Southern nullifiers perverted beyond recognition, and then dishonored by rebellion, was that of Jefferson, Madison, and Sam Adams."
Speech is free in this country for poets and orators of the lost cause, but they can have no influence or control in shaping the issues of 1872, or onward, till by baptism and good works, they show they have put away forever the dead and dismal past, and submitted to the discipline of the party.
"Jefferson Davis, and his abettors, promoted a condition of things among the ruling politicians of the South which precipitated the rebellion."
In our nostrils, the lost cause is a stench, and we seek to bury it out of our sight.
It is not grateful to our feelings now, no matter what our opinions of him may have been, to hear Jefferson Davis spoken of by our friend, as 'a bankrupt politician, a blundering old man,' a false prophet; who, on former occasions, egregiously deceived and misled the Southern people to their ruin. We cannot help thinking Mr. Davis has been unfortunate in the use of certain expressions recently uttered, or rather, we regret that he has not maintained an unbroken silence on political subjects, for the reason that nothing he could say could, by the plainest English, be made so plain as not to be misrepresented and perverted to the damage of the South; but our respect for him is too great, and our remembrance of his past services too fresh, too grateful, and too reverential, to hear him vilified without resentment.
It is not soothing to the feelings of Southern men to be likened to such savages as the Communists of Paris, at whose brutalities and atrocities the world is even now shuddering with horror. Southern men are not yet prepared to hear with patience, from their friends, at least, that they are rebels, and responsible for the late war. In the nostrils of Southern men, the lost cause, as they understand it, has not yet become a stench, nor have they yet lost that instinct of humanity, whether savage or civilized, that prevents men, though they may have put their dead out of sight, from quietly hearing them reviled and insulted. We indeed bury our dead, but the idea of declaring, or allowing others in our presence to declare, that they are a stench in our nostrils, is simply revolting. As free men, possessing the right of suffrage, we cannot quietly submit to be told by those who ask our suffrage, and who cannot succeed without it, that we can have no influence or control in shaping the issues of 1872, or onward, until we have complied with conditions they desire to impose. If we are to take no part in shaping the issues of 1872, it must be for the reason that we decline to appear in the National Democratic councils, and not because we are excluded therefrom by our Northern brethren. We approve the new departure, but we utterly repudiate the interpretation sought to be given to it by the World.
Saturday Morning, June 10, 1871.
"And Thou too, O: Brite Tho'e World"
We agree, with our contemporary of the Wilmington Journal, in its strictures upon the tone of temper recently exhibited by the New York World in its reference to ex-President Davis. The World should bear in mind, that when it undertakes to relieve the Democratic party of any responsibility for the political tenets and policy of Mr. Davis, it is not either wise or becoming for it to imitate the Radical press in their usual vituperation of the South, and disregard of Southern sensibilities. The Journal says:
We beg leave, also, to suggest whether the contrast afforded by the utterances of such Republicans as General Sherman, Senator Schurz, and Senator Trumbull, and others, when placed side by side with the following from the New York World, will have a tendency to attract Southern men to the candidate supported and endorsed by the World:
"There is a similarity in one point between the secessionists of this country, under Jefferson Davis, and the Communists of Paris, under their hydra-headed leadership. Both misused, disgraced, and finally desecrated a good idea.
"The creed which Southern nullifiers perverted beyond recognition, and then dishonored by rebellion, was that of Jefferson, Madison, and Sam Adams."
Speech is free in this country for poets and orators of the lost cause, but they can have no influence or control in shaping the issues of 1872, or onward, till by baptism and good works, they show they have put away forever the dead and dismal past, and submitted to the discipline of the party.
"Jefferson Davis, and his abettors, promoted a condition of things among the ruling politicians of the South which precipitated the rebellion."
In our nostrils, the lost cause is a stench, and we seek to bury it out of our sight.
It is not grateful to our feelings now, no matter what our opinions of him may have been, to hear Jefferson Davis spoken of by our friend, as 'a bankrupt politician, a blundering old man,' a false prophet; who, on former occasions, egregiously deceived and misled the Southern people to their ruin. We cannot help thinking Mr. Davis has been unfortunate in the use of certain expressions recently uttered, or rather, we regret that he has not maintained an unbroken silence on political subjects, for the reason that nothing he could say could, by the plainest English, be made so plain as not to be misrepresented and perverted to the damage of the South; but our respect for him is too great, and our remembrance of his past services too fresh, too grateful, and too reverential, to hear him vilified without resentment.
It is not soothing to the feelings of Southern men to be likened to such savages as the Communists of Paris, at whose brutalities and atrocities the world is even now shuddering with horror. Southern men are not yet prepared to hear with patience, from their friends, at least, that they are rebels, and responsible for the late war. In the nostrils of Southern men, the lost cause, as they understand it, has not yet become a stench, nor have they yet lost that instinct of humanity, whether savage or civilized, that prevents men, though they may have put their dead out of sight, from quietly hearing them reviled and insulted. We indeed bury our dead, but the idea of declaring, or allowing others in our presence to declare, that they are a stench in our nostrils, is simply revolting. As free men, possessing the right of suffrage, we cannot quietly submit to be told by those who ask our suffrage, and who cannot succeed without it, that we can have no influence or control in shaping the issues of 1872, or onward, until we have complied with conditions they desire to impose. If we are to take no part in shaping the issues of 1872, it must be for the reason that we decline to appear in the National Democratic councils, and not because we are excluded therefrom by our Northern brethren. We approve the new departure, but we utterly repudiate the interpretation sought to be given to it by the World.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Jefferson Davis
New York World
Lost Cause
Southern Sensibilities
Democratic Party
1872 Election
Paris Communists
Political Reconciliation
What entities or persons were involved?
Jefferson Davis
New York World
Wilmington Journal
General Sherman
Senator Schurz
Senator Trumbull
Southern Men
Democrats
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Southern Sensibilities And Jefferson Davis Against New York World Criticism
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Resentful Toward Northern Democratic Rhetoric
Key Figures
Jefferson Davis
New York World
Wilmington Journal
General Sherman
Senator Schurz
Senator Trumbull
Southern Men
Democrats
Key Arguments
The New York World Should Not Imitate Radical Vituperation When Distancing Democrats From Davis
Southerners Resent Comparison Of Secessionists To Paris Communists
Jefferson Davis's Past Services Deserve Respect, Not Vilification
Southern Men Are Not Prepared To Hear The Lost Cause Called A Stench
Southerners Reject Conditions Imposed For Influence In 1872 Democratic Issues
Southern Participation In 1872 Depends On Their Choice, Not Exclusion By Northern Brethren
Approval Of Democratic New Departure But Repudiation Of World's Interpretation