Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
October 27, 1838
New Hampshire Statesman And State Journal
Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
The editorial analyzes the 1838 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, where Whig incumbent Ritner lost to Democrat Porter amid alleged administration corruption, but Whigs gained congressional seats, legislative majorities, and popular vote increases, boosting confidence for the 1840 presidential race.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
THE STATESMAN.
CONCORD: SATURDAY, OCT. 27, 1838.
PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION.
It is not a matter of surprise to us, nor even of disappointment, that the Tories have elected their candidate, Porter, for Governor in Pennsylvania. The re-election of Ritner, was rather to be hoped for than expected. The Tories in the late contests have invariably carried a majority of the votes, and the success of the Whigs depended on whatever they might gain. Now it is obvious that the Tories, marshalled by the minions of the administration, had a decided advantage over their Whig opponents—where the threats of power or bribery could have effect they made no hesitation to introduce them. The means have served their purpose so far as the election of Governor was an object, but if the same means had been used against them, Ritner would have been elected by twenty thousand majority. The Whigs, on the whole, have much reason to be satisfied and to rejoice in the termination of the contest; they have gained two members of Congress, and the State Legislature, and with all the influence of the office holders and the corrupt use of the people's money against them, they have gained more than four thousand, net, on the popular vote. These successes are of infinitely more importance to the Whigs than the election of their candidate for Governor. It is sufficient that the Whigs have gained even in Pennsylvania. The result has given them new confidence in their own strength, and they are well aware that the friends of the administration cannot muster the means of such another contest.
We well remember that in 1828, in the contest between Adams and Jackson, the friends of the former saved the Executive of Kentucky, Ohio, and some other States, while they lost the Legislatures. Upon the election of Governor they based their hopes of future success. How futile that hope. Will it not prove the same now with the present administration. They have a Governor in Maryland, they have a Governor in Pennsylvania, they have a Governor in Illinois, in each case elected after a most severe contest with the people; but in each of these States the Whigs have majorities in the Legislatures, and we can scarce entertain a doubt that each of these States will sustain the Whig candidate for President in 1840, by an overwhelming majority.
CONCORD: SATURDAY, OCT. 27, 1838.
PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION.
It is not a matter of surprise to us, nor even of disappointment, that the Tories have elected their candidate, Porter, for Governor in Pennsylvania. The re-election of Ritner, was rather to be hoped for than expected. The Tories in the late contests have invariably carried a majority of the votes, and the success of the Whigs depended on whatever they might gain. Now it is obvious that the Tories, marshalled by the minions of the administration, had a decided advantage over their Whig opponents—where the threats of power or bribery could have effect they made no hesitation to introduce them. The means have served their purpose so far as the election of Governor was an object, but if the same means had been used against them, Ritner would have been elected by twenty thousand majority. The Whigs, on the whole, have much reason to be satisfied and to rejoice in the termination of the contest; they have gained two members of Congress, and the State Legislature, and with all the influence of the office holders and the corrupt use of the people's money against them, they have gained more than four thousand, net, on the popular vote. These successes are of infinitely more importance to the Whigs than the election of their candidate for Governor. It is sufficient that the Whigs have gained even in Pennsylvania. The result has given them new confidence in their own strength, and they are well aware that the friends of the administration cannot muster the means of such another contest.
We well remember that in 1828, in the contest between Adams and Jackson, the friends of the former saved the Executive of Kentucky, Ohio, and some other States, while they lost the Legislatures. Upon the election of Governor they based their hopes of future success. How futile that hope. Will it not prove the same now with the present administration. They have a Governor in Maryland, they have a Governor in Pennsylvania, they have a Governor in Illinois, in each case elected after a most severe contest with the people; but in each of these States the Whigs have majorities in the Legislatures, and we can scarce entertain a doubt that each of these States will sustain the Whig candidate for President in 1840, by an overwhelming majority.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Pennsylvania Election
Whig Gains
Tory Victory
Gubernatorial Contest
1840 Presidency
Administration Corruption
Legislative Majorities
What entities or persons were involved?
Porter
Ritner
Whigs
Tories
Administration
Adams
Jackson
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Pennsylvania Gubernatorial Election Results And Whig Prospects
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Whigs, Critical Of Administration Corruption
Key Figures
Porter
Ritner
Whigs
Tories
Administration
Adams
Jackson
Key Arguments
Tories Elected Porter Despite Whig Hopes For Ritner
Administration Used Threats And Bribery To Advantage
Whigs Gained Two Congress Members And Legislative Majorities
Net Gain Of Over 4,000 Votes For Whigs
Whig Successes More Important Than Gubernatorial Loss
Similar To 1828, Legislative Control Predicts 1840 Presidential Win
Whigs Confident Administration Cannot Repeat Tactics