Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
January 1, 1880
Iron County Register
Ironton, Iron County, Missouri
What is this article about?
The New York Sun defends Maine Gov. Garcelon and Council for rejecting Blaine's illegal returns, contrasting it with corrupt actions in Louisiana, urging Blaine to accept the outcome truthfully.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The New York Sun--an independent paper, and one quite ready to lecture the Democrats when it thinks they deserve it--in reference to the Maine question, says:
"There is no kind of similitude between that case in Louisiana and this case in Maine. Wells and the notorious rogues associated with him threw out the Tilden votes arbitrarily, corruptly, and in the very teeth of the law which made them a Returning Board. Gov. Garcelon and his Council, on the other hand, reject Mr. Blaine's returns because they are "fatally defective," not merely irregular, but illegal, against the statute, and barred by the Constitution. What else could they do? Were they to admit returns which were not returns? Were the Constitution and laws of Maine to be set aside in order to put Mr. Blaine's friends in office? Or were the State officers bound in this, as in all other instances, to obey their oaths and do their sworn duty? They did not, like Wells and Anderson, undertake to inquire into the charges of bribery and intimidation, because, like Wells, they had no legal right to do that. Had the case been otherwise, however, and had the law directed them to deal judicially with these questions, the judgment would certainly have cut deeper and hurt worse. Mr. Blaine should be thankful that he comes off so easily; he should, at all events, compose himself sufficiently to speak the truth when he has so little to gain by perverting it."
"There is no kind of similitude between that case in Louisiana and this case in Maine. Wells and the notorious rogues associated with him threw out the Tilden votes arbitrarily, corruptly, and in the very teeth of the law which made them a Returning Board. Gov. Garcelon and his Council, on the other hand, reject Mr. Blaine's returns because they are "fatally defective," not merely irregular, but illegal, against the statute, and barred by the Constitution. What else could they do? Were they to admit returns which were not returns? Were the Constitution and laws of Maine to be set aside in order to put Mr. Blaine's friends in office? Or were the State officers bound in this, as in all other instances, to obey their oaths and do their sworn duty? They did not, like Wells and Anderson, undertake to inquire into the charges of bribery and intimidation, because, like Wells, they had no legal right to do that. Had the case been otherwise, however, and had the law directed them to deal judicially with these questions, the judgment would certainly have cut deeper and hurt worse. Mr. Blaine should be thankful that he comes off so easily; he should, at all events, compose himself sufficiently to speak the truth when he has so little to gain by perverting it."
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Maine Question
Election Returns
Blaine
Garcelon
Louisiana Comparison
Returning Board
Constitutional Duty
What entities or persons were involved?
New York Sun
Wells
Gov. Garcelon
Council
Mr. Blaine
Tilden
Anderson
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Maine Election Officials In Dispute Over Blaine's Returns
Stance / Tone
Strongly Supportive Of Garcelon And Critical Of Blaine
Key Figures
New York Sun
Wells
Gov. Garcelon
Council
Mr. Blaine
Tilden
Anderson
Key Arguments
No Similitude Between Louisiana And Maine Cases
Wells Threw Out Tilden Votes Corruptly
Garcelon Rejected Blaine's Returns As Fatally Defective And Illegal
Officials Obeyed Oaths And Duty
Did Not Inquire Into Bribery Like In Louisiana Due To No Legal Right
Blaine Should Be Thankful And Speak Truth