Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
March 22, 1919
Tonopah Daily Bonanza
Tonopah, Nye County, Nevada
What is this article about?
Editorial praises Reno citizens for defeating a bill to centralize municipal power via appointments, criticizing the Gazette newspaper's meddling as part of the state political machine and dismissing influence of expatriated divorcees on local affairs.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
NO ONE MAN POWER
Citizens of Reno rebuked the officious meddling of the Gazette with their political affairs by promptly securing defeat of the measure designed to place that town under an appointive power by divesting the present town council of its authority and centralizing the town management in a few individuals. The bill met a deserved fate. The result should be a warning to others that there is a limit to which taxpayers may be driven and also answers the inquiry if there is an end to boss dictation in directing municipal affairs. The Gazette remonstrates by ascribing the defeat to "a small combination of officeholders assisted by a brigade of young men who are opposed to making the office of city attorney appointive."
This statement is a humiliating confession of impotency and in a few words conveys the fact that the Gazette is without influence in its own bailiwick and that the people preferred to do what "a few young men" urged rather than accept the advice of an organ which has always been regarded as a part of the state political machine. That paper has been leading around a tame bull with a ring in his nose until the animal became so infuriated that it turned on its captor and chased him into the tall timber. The influence of a newspaper may be measured by results. The Gazette usurped the rights of an advisor to assume the role of dictator for which it was not qualified by influence or training. If the citizens of Reno were eager to revise their charter there would have been such a demonstration at the capital that the lawmakers would not dare deny the majority the privilege of running their own business. Reno got what was coming to it. The expatriated divorcees do not represent Nevada any more than they do their temporary place of residence and the legislature did exactly what was right in refusing to make any radical change in the operation of the city. The colony of short term residents have to learn one thing and that is that they are permitted to remain here on sufferance so long as they behave themselves and do not try to interfere too much with what does not concern them.
Citizens of Reno rebuked the officious meddling of the Gazette with their political affairs by promptly securing defeat of the measure designed to place that town under an appointive power by divesting the present town council of its authority and centralizing the town management in a few individuals. The bill met a deserved fate. The result should be a warning to others that there is a limit to which taxpayers may be driven and also answers the inquiry if there is an end to boss dictation in directing municipal affairs. The Gazette remonstrates by ascribing the defeat to "a small combination of officeholders assisted by a brigade of young men who are opposed to making the office of city attorney appointive."
This statement is a humiliating confession of impotency and in a few words conveys the fact that the Gazette is without influence in its own bailiwick and that the people preferred to do what "a few young men" urged rather than accept the advice of an organ which has always been regarded as a part of the state political machine. That paper has been leading around a tame bull with a ring in his nose until the animal became so infuriated that it turned on its captor and chased him into the tall timber. The influence of a newspaper may be measured by results. The Gazette usurped the rights of an advisor to assume the role of dictator for which it was not qualified by influence or training. If the citizens of Reno were eager to revise their charter there would have been such a demonstration at the capital that the lawmakers would not dare deny the majority the privilege of running their own business. Reno got what was coming to it. The expatriated divorcees do not represent Nevada any more than they do their temporary place of residence and the legislature did exactly what was right in refusing to make any radical change in the operation of the city. The colony of short term residents have to learn one thing and that is that they are permitted to remain here on sufferance so long as they behave themselves and do not try to interfere too much with what does not concern them.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Constitutional
What keywords are associated?
Reno Politics
Gazette Meddling
Municipal Power
Political Machine
Boss Dictation
Divorce Colony
What entities or persons were involved?
Citizens Of Reno
Gazette
Town Council
State Political Machine
Expatriated Divorcees
Legislature
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Opposition To Centralizing Power In Reno Municipal Government
Stance / Tone
Critical Of Gazette Meddling And Supportive Of Local Control
Key Figures
Citizens Of Reno
Gazette
Town Council
State Political Machine
Expatriated Divorcees
Legislature
Key Arguments
Citizens Defeated Bill To Rebuke Gazette's Interference
Bill Would Divest Council Authority And Centralize Power In Few Individuals
Gazette's Defeat Shows Its Lack Of Influence
People Rejected Machine Dictation For Local Preference
Divorcees Do Not Represent Nevada And Should Not Interfere