Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 3, 1844
The Cecil Whig
Elkton, Cecil County, Maryland
What is this article about?
Officers of the Bel Air District Clay Club refute a slanderous claim in the Harford Republican and Baltimore Republican and Argus that Mr. Collins urged disfranchising Irish immigrants at a Whig meeting on July 6, 1844. They affirm Collins denounced the Native American Association and the meeting was well-attended.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
A SLANDER REFUTED!
The attention of the undersigned has been called to the following article in the Baltimore Republican and Argus of the 20th inst:
"The Harford Republican says:
"The Whig Hickory meeting was a
"failure. The man Collins was there,
"but the whigs of Harford would not turn
"out to hear him. John Randolph said
"he had never heard of an Irish Tory, but
"he would not have said so if he were
"now living. He would see a man calling
"himself Irish, who is going about the
"country urging the people to disfran-
"chise his countrymen. If an American
"born citizen were to desire to exclude
"all but his own 'countrymen from the
"benefits and privileges of freemen, he
"would be justly chargeable with want of
"liberty; but when an Irishman who
"knows the oppression, under which his
"country suffers, wishes to close the
"doors of this asylum for the oppressed of
"all nations against his own brethren. we
"regard it as little better than fratricide?"
When the above statement first appear-ed in the editorial column of the Harford Republican, its falsity was so gross, and so notorious throughout our county, that it was deemed entirely superfluous to give it any public contradiction. But since it has found its way into the col-umns of a paper which circulates where the circumstances of the meeting referred to are not known, it is now due alike to Mr. Collins, to ourselves, and to the pub-lic generally, that we should notice this slander in the manner it deserves.
We therefore, the officers of the Bel-air District Clay Club, before which, on the 6th of July, the speech of Mr. Collins above referred to was delivered. state that we were present at the meeting and heard Mr. Collins' speech throughout, and we do hereby pronounce the statement of the editor of the Harford Republican in refer-ence to that address. to be without the slightest foundation in fact, and whether said statement was gratuitously fabricated by said editor, or made from information received from others, we declare said statement from the beginning to the end, both in letter and spirit, to be positively false. A considerable portion of Mr. Collins' speech was in denunciation of the designs of the Native American Associa-tion; and he spoke at considerable length to prove (as he did most conclusively) that the Whig, as a party, had no sympa-thy with the principles of said association. Not one word did he utter which could afford the slightest foundation for the as-sertion that he is "going about the country urging the people to disfranchise his own countrymen;" and the falseness of such an assertion is only equaled by its absur-dity.
The statement we have above made will be fully corroborated by every indi-vidual who listened to Mr. Collins speech; and the "whigs of Harford had turned out to hear him" in great numbers from all quarters, forming one of the lar-gest and most enthusiastic whig meetings we have ever witnessed in that part of the county.
HARRY D. GOUGH, Pres't
Tho. P. MOORS,
V. Pres't.
COLEMAN YELLOTT,
WM. B. BOND, Cor. Sec.
JOHN T. COLEMAN, Rec Sec.
SAM'L. BRADFORD, Treasurer.
Harford County July 19, 1844.
The attention of the undersigned has been called to the following article in the Baltimore Republican and Argus of the 20th inst:
"The Harford Republican says:
"The Whig Hickory meeting was a
"failure. The man Collins was there,
"but the whigs of Harford would not turn
"out to hear him. John Randolph said
"he had never heard of an Irish Tory, but
"he would not have said so if he were
"now living. He would see a man calling
"himself Irish, who is going about the
"country urging the people to disfran-
"chise his countrymen. If an American
"born citizen were to desire to exclude
"all but his own 'countrymen from the
"benefits and privileges of freemen, he
"would be justly chargeable with want of
"liberty; but when an Irishman who
"knows the oppression, under which his
"country suffers, wishes to close the
"doors of this asylum for the oppressed of
"all nations against his own brethren. we
"regard it as little better than fratricide?"
When the above statement first appear-ed in the editorial column of the Harford Republican, its falsity was so gross, and so notorious throughout our county, that it was deemed entirely superfluous to give it any public contradiction. But since it has found its way into the col-umns of a paper which circulates where the circumstances of the meeting referred to are not known, it is now due alike to Mr. Collins, to ourselves, and to the pub-lic generally, that we should notice this slander in the manner it deserves.
We therefore, the officers of the Bel-air District Clay Club, before which, on the 6th of July, the speech of Mr. Collins above referred to was delivered. state that we were present at the meeting and heard Mr. Collins' speech throughout, and we do hereby pronounce the statement of the editor of the Harford Republican in refer-ence to that address. to be without the slightest foundation in fact, and whether said statement was gratuitously fabricated by said editor, or made from information received from others, we declare said statement from the beginning to the end, both in letter and spirit, to be positively false. A considerable portion of Mr. Collins' speech was in denunciation of the designs of the Native American Associa-tion; and he spoke at considerable length to prove (as he did most conclusively) that the Whig, as a party, had no sympa-thy with the principles of said association. Not one word did he utter which could afford the slightest foundation for the as-sertion that he is "going about the country urging the people to disfranchise his own countrymen;" and the falseness of such an assertion is only equaled by its absur-dity.
The statement we have above made will be fully corroborated by every indi-vidual who listened to Mr. Collins speech; and the "whigs of Harford had turned out to hear him" in great numbers from all quarters, forming one of the lar-gest and most enthusiastic whig meetings we have ever witnessed in that part of the county.
HARRY D. GOUGH, Pres't
Tho. P. MOORS,
V. Pres't.
COLEMAN YELLOTT,
WM. B. BOND, Cor. Sec.
JOHN T. COLEMAN, Rec Sec.
SAM'L. BRADFORD, Treasurer.
Harford County July 19, 1844.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
Immigration
What keywords are associated?
Slander Refutation
Mr Collins Speech
Native American Association
Whig Meeting
Harford County
Irish Immigrants
Disfranchisement
Clay Club
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Collins
Harry D. Gough
Tho. P. Moors
Coleman Yellott
Wm. B. Bond
John T. Coleman
Sam'l. Bradford
Bel Air District Clay Club
Harford Republican
Baltimore Republican And Argus
Native American Association
John Randolph
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Refutation Of Slander Against Mr. Collins' Speech On Native American Association
Stance / Tone
Strongly Defensive Refutation Of False Claims
Key Figures
Mr. Collins
Harry D. Gough
Tho. P. Moors
Coleman Yellott
Wm. B. Bond
John T. Coleman
Sam'l. Bradford
Bel Air District Clay Club
Harford Republican
Baltimore Republican And Argus
Native American Association
John Randolph
Key Arguments
The Harford Republican's Statement About Mr. Collins' Speech Is Entirely False.
Mr. Collins Denounced The Designs Of The Native American Association.
The Whig Party Has No Sympathy With The Native American Association's Principles.
Mr. Collins Did Not Urge Disfranchising His Countrymen.
The Whig Meeting Was Large And Enthusiastic.
The Slander Is Gross And Notorious In Harford County.