Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeRichmond Enquirer
Richmond, Richmond County, Virginia
What is this article about?
A communicated letter contradicts the Opposition Press's assertion that other candidates would have won in Charlotte District without Judge Tucker, claiming his widespread support and predicting confirmation in April elections.
OCR Quality
Full Text
CONTRADICTION.
It is said by the Opposition Press, that in the Charlotte District, "if Judge Tucker had been out of the canvass, Mr. Anderson, or Mr. Bolling, or Mr. Wilson either, would have been elected." It has not yet come to the writer's knowledge, that one single vote would have gone to those gentlemen, in preference to Judge Tucker—and his acquaintance is very extensive.
There are a great many ifs and ands on some occasions; and it is sincerely believed, that there are some, if not all of the gentlemen, who would not have reached as high a poll as Judge Tucker did. The whole force of the Opposition was out; and the April Elections will prove it.
MAGNA EST VERITAS.
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
Letter to Editor Details
Main Argument
the letter refutes the opposition press's claim that in the charlotte district, candidates like mr. anderson, mr. bolling, or mr. wilson would have been elected if judge tucker had not run, asserting that judge tucker had extensive support and no votes would have gone to them instead.
Notable Details