Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 19, 1822
The Alexandria Herald
Alexandria, Virginia
What is this article about?
A New England editorial critiques a Georgia piece defending political intrigue as essential, arguing instead that honesty and direct appeal to the people should prevail in free government, citing examples like Aaron Burr and De Witt Clinton as warnings to intriguers, especially regarding the next presidency.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
From the Milledgeville Journal.
"All the heads of the department have been roundly charged with being intriguers ? What of that ? Suppose they are intriguers ? Is not the spirit of intrigue intimately connected with the very existence of all our institutions? 'Jefferson was a giant at intrigue. So was Washington ; but veneration for his character gave it a milder name. It was called address. In them it was the disposition and the power to accomplish honest purposes by honest means : it was a necessary qualification in the stations they filled. And, in this sense, it is as necessary for the success and elevation of any man, in a free government, as the density of the atmosphere is for the elevation of the clouds."
If this be sound doctrine in Georgia, we do not recognise it as such in New England. What! Reduce Washington and Jefferson to a level with such men as Talleyrand, Fouche, Mazarine, or Machiavelli ! Is it really true, that intrigue is "necessary for the elevation and success" of any man in a free government ? We had once flattered ourselves that it was the glory of a free government like ours, where discussion is as free as air, that our citizens were elevated to office not by intrigue and management, but by a direct appeal to the good sense of an intelligent people, and we confess we still cling to the same belief. We do not believe that the people of our country are to be managed by intrigue, nor do we believe that our politicians will gain any substantial success by intrigue. They may triumph for a while, but detection will bring them to defeat and disgrace.-- Aaron Burr intrigued to the President of the United States, and let his fate be a warning to all intriguers for this office.-- De Witt Clinton is another sample of the fate which ambitious intriguers have experienced.
Our doctrine is, that for politicians as well as for every body else, "honesty is the best policy." And though we are assured that, in relation to the next Presidency, a system of "monkery" and intrigue is even now in full operation, we do not despair that the people will yet set all things right, that intrigues and intriguers will be disappointed, and that honesty, integrity, and faithful public services, will triumph over management, suppleness, and promises of executive patronage.
[ Boston Pat.
"All the heads of the department have been roundly charged with being intriguers ? What of that ? Suppose they are intriguers ? Is not the spirit of intrigue intimately connected with the very existence of all our institutions? 'Jefferson was a giant at intrigue. So was Washington ; but veneration for his character gave it a milder name. It was called address. In them it was the disposition and the power to accomplish honest purposes by honest means : it was a necessary qualification in the stations they filled. And, in this sense, it is as necessary for the success and elevation of any man, in a free government, as the density of the atmosphere is for the elevation of the clouds."
If this be sound doctrine in Georgia, we do not recognise it as such in New England. What! Reduce Washington and Jefferson to a level with such men as Talleyrand, Fouche, Mazarine, or Machiavelli ! Is it really true, that intrigue is "necessary for the elevation and success" of any man in a free government ? We had once flattered ourselves that it was the glory of a free government like ours, where discussion is as free as air, that our citizens were elevated to office not by intrigue and management, but by a direct appeal to the good sense of an intelligent people, and we confess we still cling to the same belief. We do not believe that the people of our country are to be managed by intrigue, nor do we believe that our politicians will gain any substantial success by intrigue. They may triumph for a while, but detection will bring them to defeat and disgrace.-- Aaron Burr intrigued to the President of the United States, and let his fate be a warning to all intriguers for this office.-- De Witt Clinton is another sample of the fate which ambitious intriguers have experienced.
Our doctrine is, that for politicians as well as for every body else, "honesty is the best policy." And though we are assured that, in relation to the next Presidency, a system of "monkery" and intrigue is even now in full operation, we do not despair that the people will yet set all things right, that intrigues and intriguers will be disappointed, and that honesty, integrity, and faithful public services, will triumph over management, suppleness, and promises of executive patronage.
[ Boston Pat.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Political Intrigue
Honesty In Government
Free Government
Presidential Election
Aaron Burr
De Witt Clinton
What entities or persons were involved?
Jefferson
Washington
Talleyrand
Fouche
Mazarine
Machiavelli
Aaron Burr
De Witt Clinton
Milledgeville Journal
Boston Pat.
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Critique Of Political Intrigue In Free Government
Stance / Tone
Anti Intrigue, Pro Honesty In Politics
Key Figures
Jefferson
Washington
Talleyrand
Fouche
Mazarine
Machiavelli
Aaron Burr
De Witt Clinton
Milledgeville Journal
Boston Pat.
Key Arguments
Intrigue Is Not Necessary For Success In Free Government
Washington And Jefferson's 'Address' Was For Honest Purposes, Not Base Intrigue
People Elevate Leaders By Good Sense, Not Management
Intriguers Like Burr And Clinton Faced Defeat And Disgrace
Honesty Is The Best Policy For Politicians
People Will Reject Intrigue In Choosing The Next President