Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Pacific Commercial Advertiser
Editorial October 29, 1886

The Pacific Commercial Advertiser

Honolulu, Honolulu County, Hawaii

What is this article about?

Editorial defends the Hawaiian government's handling of an excessive Appropriation Act, arguing that legislative over-voting forces executive discretion and that elected representatives, not the administration, bear responsibility for fiscal issues. Critiques 'Planters' Monthly' for unfair attacks.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

THAT APPROPRIATION ACT

The "Planters' Monthly" is disquieted about the amount of money authorized to be expended under the Appropriation Act. Doubtless the amount is far in excess of any conservative estimate of the revenue; but that fact should not disquiet our plantation friends.

If the money is not in the Treasury it cannot be taken out of it, therefore it cannot be spent. The country will therefore continue to live within its means. but the Government will no doubt be censured and condemned all around the circle for not giving effect to all appropriations without diminution or change of any kind. In truth, an excessive Appropriation Act is not a good thing for any Government. It imposes a discretion as to expenditure which is wrong, because it is not contemplated by the law itself. Indeed, it is opposed to the spirit and intent of an Appropriation Act to depart in any respect from the hard and fast lines of expenditure laid down by it: but if a Legislative Assembly will insist upon voting nearly double the probable revenue. it in effect leaves the whole thing to the discretion of Ministers. Hence the necessity for having a prudent and intelligent Administration in office, because the legislative system of this Kingdom must infallibly result in excessive appropriations of public money.

These points appear to have been lost sight of by the writer in the "Planters' Monthly," and he also deals somewhat unfairly with the Executive in the following sentences: "We are fast approaching the day when we will rival San Domingo in financial ability. This community can make up its mind that the present powers that be regard the planter and the general public from but one point of view, and that is their availability as sources of revenue. So long as the community will sit still and be bled, just so long the bleeding process will continue."

This is not a "Colored Republic" like San Domingo, torn by intermittent revolution, without confidence at home or respect abroad; nor is it a "paternal government" like the Dutch Administration in the East. The people here elect their own representatives, who alone have the right to vote money and impose taxes; wherefore the people, in their corporate capacity, and not the Government as such, are responsible for what the writer in question complains of.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Policy Taxation

What keywords are associated?

Appropriation Act Government Spending Fiscal Discretion Legislative Excess Planters Monthly Revenue Policy

What entities or persons were involved?

Planters' Monthly Government Legislative Assembly Ministers San Domingo Dutch Administration

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Executive Discretion Under The Appropriation Act

Stance / Tone

Supportive Of Government Administration, Critical Of Planter Critics

Key Figures

Planters' Monthly Government Legislative Assembly Ministers San Domingo Dutch Administration

Key Arguments

Excessive Appropriations Exceed Revenue But Cannot Be Spent If Funds Unavailable Legislature's Over Voting Leaves Expenditure To Ministerial Discretion Prudent Administration Needed Due To Legislative System's Flaws Criticism Of Executive Unfair; People Elect Representatives Who Control Appropriations And Taxes Not Like Unstable San Domingo Or Paternal Dutch Rule; Local Responsibility

Are you sure?