Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Phenix Gazette
Editorial January 13, 1832

Phenix Gazette

Alexandria, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial dismisses criticism from Baltimore Gazette on Maryland Court of Appeals' decision in Rail Road case, arguing the matter is settled and rights are secured by law.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Our neighbor of the Baltimore Gazette appears to have more "hard thoughts" about the recent decision of the Court of Appeals of his State in the Rail Road case, than any of his editorial brethren. As the matter, however, is now all over, we cannot see the use of putting his threat into execution—viz.: "showing that the decision establishes principles more dangerous, as regards the power of the Legislature—and the rights of corporations, than any act of judicial legislation which has ever yet been effected in Maryland." When "doctors differ" who can decide. There are some on our side of the question who think, if a contrary decision had been made, they could have shown its dangerous principles. But this is all now of no consequence. The law gives us our rights, and we must enjoy them.

What sub-type of article is it?

Legal Reform Infrastructure

What keywords are associated?

Rail Road Case Court Of Appeals Maryland Legislature Power Corporate Rights Judicial Decision

What entities or persons were involved?

Baltimore Gazette Court Of Appeals Of Maryland Legislature Corporations

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Court Of Appeals Decision In Rail Road Case

Stance / Tone

Dismissive Of Ongoing Criticism

Key Figures

Baltimore Gazette Court Of Appeals Of Maryland Legislature Corporations

Key Arguments

Neighbor Paper Has Strong Negative Views On The Decision Matter Is Resolved, No Need To Execute Threats Of Criticism Decision Allegedly Endangers Legislative Power And Corporate Rights Opposing Views Exist On Both Sides Law Secures Rights Regardless

Are you sure?