Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
August 3, 1833
New Hampshire Statesman And State Journal
Concord, Merrimack County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
Editorial approves Nantucket Inquirer's call for press to curb public outrage over E.K. Avery's trial acquittal, comparing inflammatory coverage to historical persecutions and warning it undermines judicial authority and trial by jury.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
We approve the sentiments contained in the following paragraph from the Nantucket Inquirer. People of course form their opinions in regard to the guilt or innocence of Mr Avery, the decision of the jury to the contrary notwithstanding; but should not the public press discountenance popular ferment and those other disorganizing proceedings that have grown out of the affair, rather than feed the flame? We think so.
We regard the infuriated conduct of certain individuals in Rhode-Island and elsewhere, in relation to the late E. K. Avery in very nearly the same light in which we view that of our fanatical forefathers of Salem, the persecutions and counter persecutions of the days of Elizabeth and Mary, the diablerie of the Spanish Inquisition, and the more recent turmoils and oppressions growing out of the Morgan excitement.
The worst effect to be apprehended from such outrageous language respecting Avery, as certain conductors of the press seem prone to indulge is the contempt thereby cast upon our judicial tribunals. In the public eye, our institutions may become degraded, and our courts of justice in an especial manner lose all their wonted sanctity of character by such abandoned perversions of the liberty of the press.
Our laws themselves may be trampled upon, and the solemn decisions of judges and juries utterly reversed by mobs maddened to desperation through the unprincipled efforts of reckless newspaper scribblers. Some Rhode Island papers do not scruple openly and repeatedly to call Avery a murderer of the blackest stamp! Should such a state of things be suffered, what is the consequence? All respect for that sacred privilege, the trial by jury, must inevitably be destroyed—all confidence in the wisdom and integrity of our judicial agents entirely eradicated.
And all this hue and cry, first started by shameless journalists, is fed, and forwarded, and kept up, under the scandalous pretence, the libellous insinuation, that it is required by the cause of truth, as an expression of popular opinion!
We regard the infuriated conduct of certain individuals in Rhode-Island and elsewhere, in relation to the late E. K. Avery in very nearly the same light in which we view that of our fanatical forefathers of Salem, the persecutions and counter persecutions of the days of Elizabeth and Mary, the diablerie of the Spanish Inquisition, and the more recent turmoils and oppressions growing out of the Morgan excitement.
The worst effect to be apprehended from such outrageous language respecting Avery, as certain conductors of the press seem prone to indulge is the contempt thereby cast upon our judicial tribunals. In the public eye, our institutions may become degraded, and our courts of justice in an especial manner lose all their wonted sanctity of character by such abandoned perversions of the liberty of the press.
Our laws themselves may be trampled upon, and the solemn decisions of judges and juries utterly reversed by mobs maddened to desperation through the unprincipled efforts of reckless newspaper scribblers. Some Rhode Island papers do not scruple openly and repeatedly to call Avery a murderer of the blackest stamp! Should such a state of things be suffered, what is the consequence? All respect for that sacred privilege, the trial by jury, must inevitably be destroyed—all confidence in the wisdom and integrity of our judicial agents entirely eradicated.
And all this hue and cry, first started by shameless journalists, is fed, and forwarded, and kept up, under the scandalous pretence, the libellous insinuation, that it is required by the cause of truth, as an expression of popular opinion!
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Crime Or Punishment
Legal Reform
What keywords are associated?
Avery Case
Press Responsibility
Judicial Respect
Public Ferment
Trial By Jury
Liberty Of The Press
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr Avery
E. K. Avery
Nantucket Inquirer
Rhode Island Papers
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Criticism Of Inflammatory Press Coverage In The Avery Case
Stance / Tone
Condemnation Of Press Sensationalism And Public Ferment
Key Figures
Mr Avery
E. K. Avery
Nantucket Inquirer
Rhode Island Papers
Key Arguments
Public Press Should Discountenance Popular Ferment Rather Than Feed It
Infuriated Conduct Resembles Historical Persecutions Like Salem Witch Trials
Outrageous Language Casts Contempt On Judicial Tribunals
Such Conduct Degrades Institutions And Courts
Laws And Jury Decisions May Be Reversed By Mobs Incited By Press
Calling Avery A Murderer Undermines Trial By Jury
Respect For Jury And Judicial Integrity Must Be Preserved
Press Claims Of Truth And Popular Opinion Are Scandalous Pretences