Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Memphis Daily Appeal
Story May 11, 1862

Memphis Daily Appeal

Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee

What is this article about?

Article compares forces engaged and losses in major historical battles, including Shiloh (1862), Waterloo, and Napoleonic engagements, emphasizing Shiloh's scale relative to modern battles up to that point.

Merged-components note: These three components form a single article comparing great battles of modern times, including Shiloh, split during parsing.

Clipping

OCR Quality

88% Good

Full Text

GREAT BATTLES - A COMPARISON.

As we have now definitely ascertained the loss

of both the contending parties in the great battle

of Shiloh, fought on the 6th and 7th of April,

and the country is daily - almost hourly - in expectation

of two more terrible conflicts, greater

than any that have yet marked the progress of

this war, the following comparison of the forces

engaged and the losses sustained in the most

important engagements of modern times, possesses

a peculiar interest. With the exceptions of

Jena, Friedland, Wagram, and Waterloo, the

late battle on the Tennessee is among the greatest

of the list, taking into consideration the number

engaged. At Wagram, the French lost 23,000,

and the Austrians 38,000, and at Waterloo the

losses of the French were 33,000 while those of

the allies amounted to 29,000. The entire loss

at Wagram was 61,000, and at Waterloo 62,500.

Next to these ranks the battle of Jena, 47,100;

Eylau, between the French and Russians, 43,

000; and Austerlitz, 42,000. The Confederate

loss at Shiloh was about 7,500; the Federal

may be safely stated at 15,000.

MARENGO - June 14, 1800.

French, under Bonaparte, 32,000

Austrians, commanded by Melas, 40,000.

French Austrians

Killed and wounded......6000 6000

Prisoners...............1000 4000

AUSTERLITZ - December 2, 1805.

French, under the Emperor Napoleon, 70,000.

Russians and Austrians, commanded by

General Kutusoff, the Emperors being present,

90,000.

French Allies.

Killed, wounded and prisoners..........12,000

30,000

MAIDA - (July 4, 1806.)

The British, commanded by Sir John Stuart,

5,675.

French and Neapolitans, commanded by Regnier, 6,500.

British. F. and N.

Killed and wounded... 327 2450

JENA - (October 14, 1806.)

French, commanded by the Emperor Napoleon, 80,000,

Prussians, commanded by the Duke of Brunswick, 110,000.

French Prussians.

Killed, wounded and prisoners 4100 43,000

EYLAU - (Feb. 8, 1807.)

French, commanded by the Emperor Napoleon, 85,000

Russians, commanded by Gen. Benningsen,

75,000

French. Russians.

Killed, wounded and prisoners......18,000 25,000

FRIEDLAND - (June 14, 1807.)

French, commanded by the Emperor Napoleon, 80,000.

Russians, commanded by Gen. Benningsen,

66,000,

French. Russians.

Killed and wounded ... 8000 18,000

ASPERN - (May 21 and 23, 1809.)

French, commanded by the Emperor Napoleon, 101,000.

Austrians, commanded by the Archduke

Charles, 90,000.

French Austrians.

Killed, wounded and prisoners.......8000 20,000

WAGRAM - (July 5 and 6, 1809.)

French, commanded by the Emperor Napoleon, 130,000.

Austrians, commanded by the Archduke

Charles, 100,000

French. Austrians.

Killed, wounded and prisoners..... 23,000 38,000

NEW ORLEANS - Jan. 8, 1815.

Americans, under Gen. Jackson, 7000

English, under Gen. Pakenham, 6800

Americans English.

Killed and wounded 13 1902

WAVRE AND WATERLOO - (June 18, 1815.)

French, commanded by Emperor Napoleon,

75,000.

The Allies, under Wellington and Blucher,

110,000

Allies, under Marshal St. Arnaud and Lord

Raglan, 51,100, viz: - 25,000 French and 26,

100 English

Russians, under Prince Menchikoff, 50,000.

Allies, Russians.

Killed and wounded.. 3100 6000

INKERMAN - (Nov. 5, 1854.)

Allies, under General Canrobert and Lord

Raglan, 13,000, viz: - 8000 English and 5000

French.

Russians, under Gen. Dannenberg, 46,000

Allies, Russians.

Killed and wounded. 4126 10,500

MONTEBELLO - (May 20, 1859.)

The Allied French and Sardinians, under General

Forey, 11,500.

Austrians, under Count Stadion, 25,000.

Allies. Austrians

Killed and wounded. 900 2000

MAGENTA - (June 4 and 5, 1859.)

Allies, under Napoleon III, 110,000. (?)

Austrians, under Marshal Hess, 140,000 (?)

Allies. Austrians

Killed, wounded and prisoners.......3000 (?) 20,000 (?)

MANASSAS - (July 21, 1861.)

Federals, under Scott and McDowell, 90,000.

Confederates, under Beauregard and Joseph

Johnston, 65,000.

Federal. Confederate.

Killed, wounded and prisoners......3500 1593

SHILOH - (April 6 and 7, 1862.)

Federals, under Grant and Buell, 85,000.

Confederates, under Sidney Johnston and

Beauregard, 40,000.

Federal. Confederate.

Killed, wounded and prisoners. .....15,000 7,500

What is apparent from the above figures, by

comparison, is the transcendent magnitude of

the engagement at Shiloh over any battle of the

war, as also over most of what are regarded the

battles of modern times.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Military Action

What themes does it cover?

Catastrophe

What keywords are associated?

Battle Comparison Shiloh Waterloo Napoleonic Wars Civil War Casualties Military History

What entities or persons were involved?

Napoleon Grant Beauregard Wellington Jackson

Story Details

Key Persons

Napoleon Grant Beauregard Wellington Jackson

Event Date

1800 1862

Story Details

Comparison of troop numbers and casualties in major battles from Marengo (1800) to Shiloh (1862), noting Shiloh's significant scale with 85,000 Federals and 40,000 Confederates, losses of 15,000 and 7,500 respectively.

Are you sure?