Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Lynchburg Star
Story December 11, 1806

Lynchburg Star

Lynchburg, Virginia

What is this article about?

In the Federal Court of Kentucky District, U.S. Attorney J.H. Daviess moves against Aaron Burr for high misdemeanors, alleging preparations for a military expedition against Spanish Mexico. Judge Innes overrules the motion but grants a grand jury summons. Burr appears voluntarily with counsel H. Clay.

Merged-components note: Continuation of detailed story on the federal court motion and proceedings against Aaron Burr; text flows directly from 'granted' to 'ed; and a warrant'

Clippings

1 of 2

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

Motion in the Federal Court of the Kentucky District, against Aaron Burr, Esq. late Vice President of the United States, for crimes of high misdemeanors.

On Wednesday, about noon, on the 5th inst. J. H. Daviess, Esq. Attorney of the U. States, for the above district, rose, and addressing the court, said that he had a motion to make of the utmost magnitude, and extraordinary nature, and which regarded the welfare of the union at large. That the unhappy state of his health alone, had prevented him from making it on the first day of the term. That he should ground his motion on an affidavit which he would present to the court. He then made oath to the following affidavit :-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
Kentucky District, sct.

J. H. Daviess, attorney for the U. States, in and for said district, upon his corporal oath, doth depose and say That the deponent is informed, and doth verily believe, that a certain Aaron Burr, Esq. late vice-president of the said U. S. for several months past, hath been, and is now engaged in preparing, and setting on foot, and in providing and preparing means, for a military expedition and enterprise within this district, for the purpose of descending the Ohio and Mississippi therewith, and making war upon the subjects of the king of Spain, who are in a state of peace with the people of these United States-: To wit: on the provinces of Mexico, on the westwardly side of Louisiana, which appertain and belong to the king of Spain, an European prince, with whom these United States are at peace.-:

And said deponent further saith, that he is informed, and fully believes, that the above charge, can be and will be fully substantiated by evidence, provided this honorable court will grant compulsory process to bring in witness to testify thereto.

And the deponent further saith that he is informed, and verily believes, that the agents and emissaries of the said Burr, have purchased up, and are continuing to purchase large stores of provisions, as if for an army; which the said Burr, seems to conceal in great mystery from the people at large, his purposes and projects ; while the minds of the good people of this district, seem agitated with the current rumour that a military expedition against some neighbouring power, is preparing by said Burr.

Wherefore, said attorney, on behalf of said U. S. pray, that due process issue-to compel the personal appearance of the said Aaron Burr, in this court; and also of such witnesses as may be necessary on behalf of the said United States; and that this honorable court, will duly recognize the said Aaron Burr, to answer such charges as may be preferred against him in the premises.; and in the mean time, that he desist and refrain from all further preparation and proceeding in the said armament within the said United States, or the territories or dependencies thereof.

J. H. DAVIESS, A. U. S.

Having read this affidavit the attorney proceeded in the following words :

The present subject has much engaged my mind. The case made out is only as to the expedition against Mexico; but I have information on which I can rely, that all the western territories are the next object of the scheme- and finally, all the region of the Ohio is calculated as falling into the vortex of the new proposed revolution. What the practicability of this scheme is, I will not say; but certainly any progress in it, might cost our country much blood and treasure to undo and, at the least great public agitation must be expected.

I am determined to use every effort in my power, as an officer and as a man to prevent and defeat it.

Having made the affidavit myself, I shall make no comments on its sufficiency.

In cases of felony the affidavit must be positive, as to a felony actually committed; but in a misdemeanor of this nature where the sole object of the law is prevention, such an oath cannot be required: the thing must rest on belief as to the main point of guilt.

I could easily prove positively the purchase of supplies of various kinds; but this is no offence. Mr. Burr may purchase supplies --he may import arms--he may engage men, which I am told is actually begun yet- all these things being proved make no offence ; neither can proof of the declarations of his known confidents, of which abundance might be had, attach guilt to him-it is the design, the intent with which he makes these preparations, that constitute his misdemeanor.

There must be a great exertion of supposition to imagine a case in which positive proof of the illegal design can be had it must rest in information and belief.

The court ought therefore to issue a warrant or capias for the accused, and examine witnesses - when the court will be able to decide whether Mr. Burr should be bound to good behaviour on the premises, or recognised to appear here and answer an indictment.

His honour Judge Innes declined on account of the importance of the question, to give an opinion without taking time for consideration. This opinion he did not deliver until this morning about eleven, which opinion went to overrule the motion of the attorney of the United States, on the grounds,

1st. That the court was not invested with the power.

2d. If the court were, that the evidence was not sufficient.

The attorney then, moved for a warrant, to summon a grand jury, before whom he was to prefer an indictment against col. Burr.

This the court immediately granted; and a warrant was given to Col. Crocket, the marshal of the district for that purpose. The judge ordered his opinion to be entered on the record. A copy of it, therefore, shall be obtained and published in an extra half sheet in the beginning of the week, with the farther proceedings of the court on this important question.

1 o'clock. After the names of the grand jury were called, Col. Burr entered, attended by H. Clay, esq. as his counsel, and after having seated himself a few minutes rose and addressed the court in concise and impressive terms. He stated that he had been upon the eve of his departure from Lexington, when he was informed that his name had been mentioned with reproach in that court; that he made it his business to hasten to this place, and present himself before the court for investigation, with several other observations which we shall publish at length in our next. At present we can only say, that the grand jury were ordered to attend on Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock.

What sub-type of article is it?

Historical Event Crime Story

What themes does it cover?

Crime Punishment Justice

What keywords are associated?

Aaron Burr Treasonous Expedition Court Motion Kentucky District Grand Jury High Misdemeanors

What entities or persons were involved?

Aaron Burr J. H. Daviess Judge Innes H. Clay Col. Crocket

Where did it happen?

Federal Court Of The Kentucky District, Lexington

Story Details

Key Persons

Aaron Burr J. H. Daviess Judge Innes H. Clay Col. Crocket

Location

Federal Court Of The Kentucky District, Lexington

Event Date

5th Inst.

Story Details

U.S. Attorney J.H. Daviess files an affidavit accusing Aaron Burr of preparing a military expedition against Spanish Mexico, seeking to compel Burr's appearance and halt preparations. Judge Innes overrules due to lack of court power and insufficient evidence but grants a grand jury summons. Burr appears voluntarily with counsel.

Are you sure?