Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Domestic News
December 27, 1935
The Producers News
Plentywood, Sheridan County, Montana
What is this article about?
John F. Finerty, counsel for labor prisoner Tom Mooney, expressed confidence at a Washington defense meeting that the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in Mooney's favor, but predicted the California Supreme Court would downplay perjury in his conviction.
Clipping
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
FORESEES VICTORY FOR
MOONEY IN SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON. — Confidence that U. S. Supreme Court will finally rule in favor of Tom Mooney was expressed by John F. Finerty, counsel for the famed labor prisoner, speaking at a Washington defense meeting.
Finerty was less optimistic about ruling of the California Supreme Court whose conduct of the recent hearing he has sharply criticized. "They'll say while there was perjury involved in Mooney's conviction, it was not knowingly used by the state," he predicted.
MOONEY IN SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON. — Confidence that U. S. Supreme Court will finally rule in favor of Tom Mooney was expressed by John F. Finerty, counsel for the famed labor prisoner, speaking at a Washington defense meeting.
Finerty was less optimistic about ruling of the California Supreme Court whose conduct of the recent hearing he has sharply criticized. "They'll say while there was perjury involved in Mooney's conviction, it was not knowingly used by the state," he predicted.
What sub-type of article is it?
Legal Or Court
Politics
What keywords are associated?
Tom Mooney
Supreme Court
John Finerty
Labor Prisoner
Perjury
What entities or persons were involved?
Tom Mooney
John F. Finerty
Where did it happen?
Washington
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Washington
Key Persons
Tom Mooney
John F. Finerty
Event Details
John F. Finerty expressed confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in favor of Tom Mooney. He criticized the California Supreme Court's handling of a recent hearing and predicted they would acknowledge perjury in Mooney's conviction but claim it was not knowingly used by the state.