Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Eureka Daily Sentinel
Story February 8, 1881

Eureka Daily Sentinel

Eureka, Eureka County, Nevada

What is this article about?

The Sentinel's editor defends Mr. Daggett's influence in Washington departments against the Silver State's criticism, which mocks claims of his recommendations being accepted and alludes to his role in the disputed Louisiana electoral vote for an unqualified candidate.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Slightly Off.

The editor of the Silver State sneeringly alludes to the assertion contained in the Mining News, whose proprietor is temporarily localizing on the SENTINEL, to the effect that Mr. Daggett's recommendations were accepted without question by several of the departments in Washington. It quotes from Daggett's letter and then says:

"This shows conclusively how little the gentleman who assisted Madison Wells & Co. in giving the electoral vote of Louisiana to the man who was not entitled to it knows about the influence an honest Republican, like Daggett, has with the rogues who run the departments and control the Administration at Washington."

The article of the Silver State, if it shows anything, proves that its editor is wofully ignorant in some things. Presidential appointments, like the Indian Agency, are made in the White House, not in the departments. A man of Daggett's bearing can have no influence with the cunning hypocrite who occupies the Presidency, but we assert he has in the different departments.

What sub-type of article is it?

Deception Fraud

What themes does it cover?

Deception Betrayal

What keywords are associated?

Electoral Fraud Newspaper Dispute Political Influence Louisiana Vote Washington Departments

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Daggett Madison Wells & Co.

Where did it happen?

Washington, Louisiana

Story Details

Key Persons

Mr. Daggett Madison Wells & Co.

Location

Washington, Louisiana

Story Details

The Silver State mocks Mr. Daggett's claimed influence in Washington based on his past role in Louisiana's disputed electoral vote; the Sentinel counters by asserting his departmental sway and correcting the editor's ignorance on appointment processes.

Are you sure?