Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Lynchburg Virginian
Letter to Editor May 23, 1836

Lynchburg Virginian

Lynchburg, Virginia

What is this article about?

An anonymous writer argues that apparent support for Van Buren candidates, including from anti-abolitionist slave owners in Pittsylvania, does not indicate true backing for Van Burenism, as such voters plan to oppose him in the November election, making current elections unreliable indicators of popular sentiment.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

COMMUNICATED.

Van Burenism is not what it is cracked up to be—As a proof of it, I saw a thorough going Anti-Abolitionist, owner of a hundred Cuffees, or more, go in to vote for the Pittsylvania Van Buren candidates, with a crowd which his influence can always control. Upon being questioned as to the policy of such a vote, he replied that he had personal predilections for one of the candidates on that side, but that he would be found arrayed against Van in the fall. This is the way the thing will work; and our elections are consequently no index of the popular feeling, as you will see in November.

What sub-type of article is it?

Persuasive Political

What themes does it cover?

Politics Slavery Abolition

What keywords are associated?

Van Burenism Anti Abolitionist Slavery Pittsylvania Elections Popular Feeling November

Letter to Editor Details

Main Argument

support for van buren candidates does not reflect genuine endorsement of van burenism, as demonstrated by an anti-abolitionist slave owner voting for them due to personal preference but intending to oppose van buren in the fall election; thus, current elections misrepresent popular feeling.

Notable Details

Thorough Going Anti Abolitionist Owner Of A Hundred Cuffees Pittsylvania Van Buren Candidates Arrayed Against Van In The Fall Elections No Index Of Popular Feeling See In November

Are you sure?