Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Enquirer
Editorial August 9, 1808

The Enquirer

Richmond, Henrico County, Virginia

What is this article about?

Editorial defends James Madison against a Federalist newspaper's misrepresentation of his conversation with John Randolph in winter 1805-6, clarifying that Madison urged purchasing the Floridas from cash-strapped France before the Battle of Austerlitz, not giving money unconditionally. The deal failed, and funds remain in treasury.

Merged-components note: Continuation of the editorial piece 'IL FAUT DE L\' ARGENT' across pages; original label of second component changed from story to editorial.

Clippings

1 of 2

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

IL FAUT DE L' ARGENT

In the Courant of the 29th ult. it is asserted that Mr. Madison declared to John Randolph, "that France wanted money, and we must give it"

This is a base mutilation of what passed at an interview, between those two gentlemen, some time during the session of Congress, during the winter of 1805-6. The object of the Courant, or rather of those papers from which the Courant copies, and upon which it depends for fuel, is to show, that Mr. Madison is devoted to French interest and therefore unfit for a President of the United States.

The interview and conversation to which the Courant alludes, happened "in this wise." While the two millions of dollars was before Congress, the interview took place. The object of the bill was, as every body knew, the purchase of the Floridas, and against the passage thereof Mr. Randolph had taken strong ground and made several violent speeches.

The situation of French affairs at this time, as far as was known in this country, was somewhat thus. Bonaparte was on his way to the heart of Germany, with a large army. His progress was to be resisted by very numerous German, Russian and perhaps Prussian armies, under experienced commanders—The battle of Austerlitz had not happened. It was expected that the campaign would be arduous and indecisive. The pecuniary resources of France, were supposed to be inadequate.
At the interview in question, the observations of Mr. Madison were often important. "Now is the time to purchase the Floridas; France wants money and MUST HAVE IT;" (not "WE MUST give it," as stated in the Courant.) "We never shall have a better opportunity to purchase these provinces: they are a natural appendage to the United States." From this statement of plain facts, has been elicited a most grievous charge against Mr. Madison. By a similar perversion of a passage in the "Notes on Virginia," federalists, eight years ago, proved Mr. Jefferson to be a polytheist: by a similar perversion, an atheist may prove from the sacred scriptures, "there is no God."

Before the negotiation for the purchase of the Floridas had succeeded, the battle of Austerlitz was fought: the Russian army was dispersed or captured: Bonaparte had made peace with Prussia and Germany: France wanted no money: and the two millions of dollars still remain in the treasury of the United States. Federal editors! will you be satisfied till September?

Amer. Merc.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Foreign Affairs Imperialism

What keywords are associated?

Madison Defense Florida Purchase France Money Federalist Attack Austerlitz Battle Congress Bill

What entities or persons were involved?

Mr. Madison John Randolph Bonaparte Courant Federal Editors

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defense Of Madison Against Misrepresentation On Florida Purchase

Stance / Tone

Strongly Defensive Of Madison, Critical Of Federalist Editors

Key Figures

Mr. Madison John Randolph Bonaparte Courant Federal Editors

Key Arguments

Courant Misquotes Madison As Saying 'We Must Give' Money To France, Actually He Said France 'Must Have It' For Florida Purchase Interview Occurred During 1805 6 Congress Session Over $2 Million Bill For Floridas France Needed Money Pre Austerlitz Due To War; Opportunity To Buy Territories Randolph Opposed The Bill Vehemently Deal Failed After Austerlitz Victory; Funds Unused Similar To Past Federalist Perversions Against Jefferson

Are you sure?