Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Voice Of Freedom
Domestic News August 3, 1843

The Voice Of Freedom

Montpelier, Brandon, Washington County, Rutland County, Vermont

What is this article about?

Two hundred citizens in Coles County, Illinois, held a public meeting resolving to ignore a U.S. Supreme Court decision invalidating the state's appraisement law, urging officers to resign if they comply, and threatening force if necessary to oppose enforcement.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Rebellion in Illinois.—The St. Louis Era, of the evening of the 5th, says:

"Two hundred citizens of Coles county, Illinois, have resolved in public meeting, that no heed should be paid to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, setting aside the appraisement law of Illinois; that all officers be advised not to carry out such decision in the sale of property; that they be asked to resign their offices if they cannot comply with such recommendations; that they (the people) will oppose them by all fair and mild means, and if that will not do, they will oppose them by force of arms and all other means in their power; that committees be appointed to ascertain from such officers whether they will persist in such sales or resign their places; that the meeting appoint officers to carry out the resolutions; that the decision of the Supreme Court is regarded unjust, and not binding on the people of Illinois; and that they pledge their lives, fortunes, and sacred honors to sustain their resolutions."

What sub-type of article is it?

Rebellion Or Revolt Politics Legal Or Court

What keywords are associated?

Illinois Rebellion Coles County Meeting Supreme Court Defiance Appraisement Law Officer Resignations

Where did it happen?

Coles County, Illinois

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Coles County, Illinois

Event Details

Two hundred citizens resolved in a public meeting to disregard the U.S. Supreme Court decision setting aside Illinois' appraisement law, advised officers not to enforce it in property sales, urged resignations if they do, threatened opposition by fair means or force, appointed committees to check officers' compliance, appointed their own officers to implement resolutions, deemed the decision unjust and non-binding, and pledged lives, fortunes, and honors to sustain the resolutions.

Are you sure?