Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
July 1, 1828
Delaware Patriot & American Watchman
Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware
What is this article about?
This editorial challenges Gen. Metcalfe's claim of being uncommitted in the 1824 presidential election, citing his conversations with Mr. Desha and Mr. Hitt that reveal an understanding to secure Mr. Clay's cabinet position by electing Mr. Adams.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
If Gen. Metcalfe should not know what he himself meant, when he stated to Mr. Hitt "we stand uncommitted, and we must know something about how the Cabinet is to be filled," perhaps we can assist him, by calling to his recollection some of his subsequent declarations. In the spring of 1825 the General met with Mr. John Desha, (a plain and honest farmer of Nicholas county,) at Carlisle—when the following dialogue ensued:
Desha.—Well General you have made us a President.
Metcalfe.—Yes.
Desha.—Do you think the people of Kentucky will be pleased with your vote?
Metcalfe.—I think they will when they hear my reasons.
Desha.—What are your reasons, sir?
Metcalfe.—Why, we could not possibly get Mr. Clay in the cabinet without voting for and electing Mr. Adams."
Now, we would thank Gen. Metcalfe to state, as he is here, on the spot, whether Gen. Metcalfe's declaration to Mr. John Desha, does not explain Gen. Metcalfe's declaration to Mr. Hitt? To Mr. Hitt he said, at Washington, "we must know something about how the cabinet is to be filled"—to Mr. Desha, in Kentucky, he said "we could not possibly get Mr. Clay in the cabinet without voting for and electing Mr. Adams." We take it as granted, that the statements of Messrs. Desha and Hitt are true—that Gen. Metcalfe will not say they are untrue—and we therefore call upon him to state, (if they do not prove the bargain,) whether they do not establish the fact, that it was understood, "that Mr. Clay would be Secretary, should Mr. Adams be elected President?"
Louisville Adv.
Desha.—Well General you have made us a President.
Metcalfe.—Yes.
Desha.—Do you think the people of Kentucky will be pleased with your vote?
Metcalfe.—I think they will when they hear my reasons.
Desha.—What are your reasons, sir?
Metcalfe.—Why, we could not possibly get Mr. Clay in the cabinet without voting for and electing Mr. Adams."
Now, we would thank Gen. Metcalfe to state, as he is here, on the spot, whether Gen. Metcalfe's declaration to Mr. John Desha, does not explain Gen. Metcalfe's declaration to Mr. Hitt? To Mr. Hitt he said, at Washington, "we must know something about how the cabinet is to be filled"—to Mr. Desha, in Kentucky, he said "we could not possibly get Mr. Clay in the cabinet without voting for and electing Mr. Adams." We take it as granted, that the statements of Messrs. Desha and Hitt are true—that Gen. Metcalfe will not say they are untrue—and we therefore call upon him to state, (if they do not prove the bargain,) whether they do not establish the fact, that it was understood, "that Mr. Clay would be Secretary, should Mr. Adams be elected President?"
Louisville Adv.
What sub-type of article is it?
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
1824 Election
Adams Clay Bargain
Metcalfe
Cabinet Position
Political Intrigue
What entities or persons were involved?
Gen. Metcalfe
Mr. Hitt
Mr. John Desha
Mr. Clay
Mr. Adams
Louisville Adv.
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Alleged Bargain For Clay's Cabinet Position In 1824 Election
Stance / Tone
Accusatory And Challenging
Key Figures
Gen. Metcalfe
Mr. Hitt
Mr. John Desha
Mr. Clay
Mr. Adams
Louisville Adv.
Key Arguments
Metcalfe's Statement To Hitt Implies Need To Know Cabinet Composition
Metcalfe's Dialogue With Desha Reveals Vote For Adams To Secure Clay In Cabinet
Desha And Hitt's Accounts Are Taken As True
These Statements Establish Understanding That Clay Would Be Secretary If Adams Elected