Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
July 31, 1894
The Yellowstone Journal
Miles City, Custer County, Montana
What is this article about?
Editorial defends protective tariffs, citing Andrew Carnegie's support and Democratic hypocrisy in opposing the Chicago platform, arguing protectionism will endure as settled policy across parties.
OCR Quality
96%
Excellent
Full Text
When such men as Carnegie, who became rich under the system, openly declare that there is no further use for a protective tariff, republican politicians and editors, who are yelling themselves hoarse for a continuance of the measure, will have to change their line of argument and substitute other reasons for the thread-bare fallacies which they have so long advanced. Protection can no longer retain a place in American politics and the sooner its advocates realize this fact the better it will be for themselves and their few blind adherents of a dead cause.—Butte Miner.
Certainly—but what about the democratic senators and representatives who have not only howled themselves hoarse but aligned themselves in open rebellion against the Chicago platform and the administration, in defence of protection? Why should republican politicians and editors "change their lines of argument and substitute other reasons" when they can proudly point to such numerous and notable converts to their "thread bare fallacies" as the present congress shows.
It may be true that protection will no longer retain a place in American politics, but if it does cease to be an issue, it will be because it has been proven to be the true policy, concurred in alike by democrats and republicans. Not because it is a dead issue, but because it has been permanently and satisfactorily settled, Mr. Carnegie and the Butte Miner to the contrary notwithstanding.
Certainly—but what about the democratic senators and representatives who have not only howled themselves hoarse but aligned themselves in open rebellion against the Chicago platform and the administration, in defence of protection? Why should republican politicians and editors "change their lines of argument and substitute other reasons" when they can proudly point to such numerous and notable converts to their "thread bare fallacies" as the present congress shows.
It may be true that protection will no longer retain a place in American politics, but if it does cease to be an issue, it will be because it has been proven to be the true policy, concurred in alike by democrats and republicans. Not because it is a dead issue, but because it has been permanently and satisfactorily settled, Mr. Carnegie and the Butte Miner to the contrary notwithstanding.
What sub-type of article is it?
Economic Policy
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Protective Tariff
Carnegie
Republican Defense
Democratic Hypocrisy
Chicago Platform
Tariff Policy
What entities or persons were involved?
Carnegie
Republican Politicians And Editors
Democratic Senators And Representatives
Chicago Platform
Administration
Butte Miner
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Of Protective Tariff
Stance / Tone
Supportive Of Protectionism And Republican Position
Key Figures
Carnegie
Republican Politicians And Editors
Democratic Senators And Representatives
Chicago Platform
Administration
Butte Miner
Key Arguments
Carnegie's Support Shows Protectionism's Validity Despite His Wealth Under It
Democrats Rebel Against Their Platform To Defend Protection
Republicans Can Highlight Democratic Converts To Their Cause
Protection Will Cease As An Issue Only Because It's Proven True Policy
Agreed Upon By Both Parties, Not Because It's Dead