Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Albuquerque Evening Herald
Albuquerque, Bernalillo County, New Mexico
What is this article about?
Attorney General Wickersham indicated in Washington on March 12 a strong likelihood of requesting a Supreme Court rehearing in the 'patent monopoly' case, decided 4-3 the previous day, on grounds that a full bench had not ruled.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
On the Ground That Full Bench Had Not Passed on Matter, New Trial Will Be Demanded.
(By Evening Herald A. P. Leased Wire)
Washington, March 12.—Attorney General Wickersham indicated today that there is a strong likelihood of a re-hearing being asked of the supreme court in the "patent monopoly" case, decided yesterday by a divided bench, four to three.
He said he had taken the matter up with the parties at issue.
The government, not being a party to the suit, can act only through the defeated parties. The re-hearing would be asked on the ground that a full bench had not passed on the case.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Domestic News Details
Primary Location
Washington
Event Date
March 12
Key Persons
Outcome
likelihood of rehearing requested on grounds full bench had not passed on case; original decision 4-3 against government interests
Event Details
Attorney General Wickersham indicated strong likelihood of asking Supreme Court for rehearing in 'patent monopoly' case decided yesterday by divided bench four to three. He discussed with parties at issue. Government not a party, acts through defeated parties.