Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Story
May 20, 1911
Democratic Messenger
Snow Hill, Worcester County, Maryland
What is this article about?
In the US Senate, a resolution for direct election of Senators gained precedence with 65 votes in favor and 5 against, supported by all Democrats and progressive Republicans, signaling a shift as conservative Senators yielded to public demand.
OCR Quality
95%
Excellent
Full Text
Tinge of the Times.
A remarkable vote for the United States Senate was recorded when the resolution to bring about the direct election of Senators was made the unfinished business and thereby given precedence over all other measures. Sixty-five Senators voted on the side of the general proposition, to five against. Every Democrat and every progressive Republican present voted in the affirmative. This does not mean that the fight over direct elections has been won outright. But it does mean that the great majority of the tory Senators have learned that they cannot persistently resist public sentiment and hope to retain their seats. No one believes that the great majority of tory Senators who voted with the progressives wanted to vote as they did. They were prompted solely by a realization that the public demands a change in the method of electing Senators, and that further defiance of the public would but hasten effective public resentment.
A remarkable vote for the United States Senate was recorded when the resolution to bring about the direct election of Senators was made the unfinished business and thereby given precedence over all other measures. Sixty-five Senators voted on the side of the general proposition, to five against. Every Democrat and every progressive Republican present voted in the affirmative. This does not mean that the fight over direct elections has been won outright. But it does mean that the great majority of the tory Senators have learned that they cannot persistently resist public sentiment and hope to retain their seats. No one believes that the great majority of tory Senators who voted with the progressives wanted to vote as they did. They were prompted solely by a realization that the public demands a change in the method of electing Senators, and that further defiance of the public would but hasten effective public resentment.
What sub-type of article is it?
Historical Event
What themes does it cover?
Triumph
Justice
What keywords are associated?
Senate Vote
Direct Election
Senators
Public Sentiment
Progressive Republicans
Where did it happen?
United States Senate
Story Details
Location
United States Senate
Story Details
A Senate vote prioritizes direct election of Senators with 65-5 approval from Democrats and progressives, forcing conservative Senators to align with public demand despite reluctance.