Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Union Daily Times
Domestic News September 19, 1925

The Union Daily Times

Union, Union County, South Carolina

What is this article about?

President Coolidge defends revoking British communist Saklatvala's US visa under exclusion laws, despite his parliamentary status for an unofficial meeting. Sen. Borah opposes, citing potential harm to US-India ties and speculating on Indian representation allowing attendance.

Clipping

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Washington, Sept. 18.-(By the Associated Press)-President Coolidge feels that government officials had no alternative under the law when they revoked the passport visa granted to Saklatvala, British communist delegate, once his revolutionary utterances had been called to their attention.

Men engaged in teaching doctrines subversive to the theories on which the American government is founded are barred from the United States by law and the fact that Saklatvala is a member of the British parliament and a delegate to the interparliamentary union does not, in Mr. Coolidge's opinion, give him special status.

The meeting is not an official one, nor was he coming as a representative of his government.

No special inquiry into the admissibility of other delegates to the meeting has been indicated, but it is assumed that the usual machinery of the government to enforce through the visa system the terms of the exclusion act will serve to single out any individual seeking to enter the United States, whether a delegate or not, whose known views and actions bring him within the prohibition of the statutes.

It was made plain today that the American authorities had no intention to reconsider the Saklatvala case.

Chairman Borah, of the senate foreign relations committee, who opposed the decision of the state department to revoke Saklatvala's passport visa, expressed the opinion today that the section might be harmful to American commercial and other interests in India.

At the same time, he thought that Saklatvala, due to his exclusion by this government was in position to make demands upon the British government that India be represented at the interparliamentary meeting. If this should be done, the senator declared he would not be surprised to see some of the strongest opposition to Saklatvala's visit to the United States withdrawn. with the result that the Indian communists leader might, after all, attend the meeting here.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Saklatvala Visa Revocation Coolidge Statement Borah Opposition Interparliamentary Union Exclusion Act

What entities or persons were involved?

President Coolidge Saklatvala Chairman Borah

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

Sept. 18

Key Persons

President Coolidge Saklatvala Chairman Borah

Outcome

passport visa revoked; no intention to reconsider; potential harm to american interests in india

Event Details

President Coolidge stated that government officials had no alternative under the law to revoke Saklatvala's passport visa due to his revolutionary utterances as a British communist delegate. Saklatvala's membership in British parliament and role in interparliamentary union do not grant special status, as the meeting is unofficial. Usual visa enforcement will apply to other delegates. Chairman Borah opposed the decision, suggesting it could harm US interests in India and that Saklatvala might demand Indian representation, potentially allowing his attendance.

Are you sure?