Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
The National Intelligencer And Washington Advertiser
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
In the British House of Lords on March 10, Lord Granville moved to consider the Roman Catholic petition, supported by some peers and opposed by others; debate adjourned to the 13th. On May 9, Dublin's city government presented a counter-petition to the House of Commons.
Clipping
OCR Quality
Full Text
On the 10th of Mar. Ld. Granville moved, in the British house of lords, that they should immediately resolve themselves into a committee of the whole to consider the petition of the Roman Catholics. The motion was supported by lord Grenville, earl Spencer and lord Holland, and opposed by lord Hawkesbury, the duke of Cumberland, lord Sidmouth, lord Mulgrave, earl Camden, the bishop of Durham, lord Redesdale and the earl of Limerick. The debate was interrupted by a motion to adjourn to the 13th, which was carried. A petition from the city government of Dublin against the Catholic petition was presented to the H. of Commons, May 9.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
London
Event Date
10th Of Mar., Adjourned To 13th; May 9
Key Persons
Outcome
debate interrupted and adjourned to the 13th, which was carried. petition from dublin city government presented to house of commons.
Event Details
Ld. Granville moved in the British House of Lords on the 10th of Mar. to resolve into a committee of the whole to consider the Roman Catholics' petition. Supported by lord Grenville, earl Spencer, and lord Holland; opposed by lord Hawkesbury, duke of Cumberland, lord Sidmouth, lord Mulgrave, earl Camden, bishop of Durham, lord Redesdale, and earl of Limerick. A petition from the city government of Dublin against the Catholic petition was presented to the House of Commons on May 9.