Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeThe National Intelligencer And Washington Advertiser
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
Official letter from Rear Admiral L. in Guadeloupe, dated 1st July, published in Paris, discusses execution of France-US treaty in the colony, return of seized vessels, unjust condemnations by privateers, and proposes report on US subjects' claims.
OCR Quality
Full Text
The Rear Admiral directed his attention to the manner in which the treaty between France and the United States was executed in the colony. He ascertained, and indeed that all the vessels which had been seized, fitted out, or condemned before the publication of it in the colony, have been returned to their respective proprietors - but he was astonished at the number of those condemned between the two periods: and the products of which had been divided between the officers and the crew of the privateers. He proposes to draw up a report, which will make known to the government the importance of the claims the subjects of the United States have a right to make. The evils are greater, because those of the Colonies, constituting a Council of Prizes at Paris, was unknown in the colony until the Rear Admiral's arrival; so that the neutrals were liable to two condemnations unjustly exercised by the Tribunals of Commerce.
What sub-type of article is it?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Foreign News Details
Primary Location
Guadeloupe
Event Date
1st July
Key Persons
Outcome
vessels seized before treaty publication returned to owners; numerous condemnations between periods with proceeds divided among privateers; unjust condemnations of neutrals by tribunals of commerce noted; report proposed on us claims.
Event Details
Rear Admiral L. reports on execution of France-US treaty in Guadeloupe colony, confirming return of pre-publication seized vessels to proprietors but expressing astonishment at post-publication condemnations and privateer divisions; highlights unawareness of Paris Council of Prizes leading to unjust neutral condemnations by commercial tribunals; proposes government report on importance of US subjects' claims.