Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for The Nome Nugget
Domestic News August 23, 1948

The Nome Nugget

Nome, Nome County, Alaska

What is this article about?

CIO longshoremen in San Francisco announced a 24-hour work stoppage and preparations for a coastwide strike on Sept. 2, demanding a uniform day off weekly. Employers criticized the action amid a deadlocked dispute; union to boycott wage election.

Merged-components note: Continuation of CIO longshoremen work stoppage and strike plans.

Clippings

1 of 2

OCR Quality

98% Excellent

Full Text

Another 24-Hour Work Stoppage

SAN FRANCISCO. (AP)—CIO longshoremen called another 24-hour waterfront work stoppage today and went ahead with plans for a coastwide strike on Sept. 2.

About 6,000 longshoremen are dispatched daily through the hiring hall here.

The international longshoremen's and warehousemen's union announces that 75 delegates from Pacific coast ports had concluded a caucus in San Francisco and were returning to their homeports "to speed preparations" for the coastal walkout.

The CIO said delegates voted to demand one full-24-hour day off each week at San Francisco, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Portland and Seattle. They want the day off to be uniform, with Sunday preferred.

Longshoremen say they are knocking off in San Francisco from 6 p.m. tomorrow until 6 p.m., Wednesday so members of the union can attend a meeting called to discuss the deadlocked maritime labor dispute.

Employers say the layoff is...
Longshoremen On Another 24-Hour Work Stoppage

(Continued from Page One)

intended "to demoralize the waterfront," and that its timing with two large passenger ships due to be handled- was "no coincidence."

There was a similar layoff last Wednesday, work was interrupted for 14 hours while the union had a meeting.

This week's work stoppage is scheduled for only four hours Wednesday. But the union says that crews which normally would work Tuesday night are laying off to "get their sleep."

James Kearney, spokesman for the longshore union, said emergency gangs would service two large passenger ships which are docking or sailing during the 24-hour layoff period.

Frank P. Foise, of the waterfront employers association, said the union layoff for contract discussions was completely unnecessary. He argued that other unions hold separate meetings for different shifts, and keep on working.

Foise, also criticized the decision of the longshoremen, revealed Saturday, to boycott an election on the employers rates offer. The national labor relations board has ordered the election as required by the Taft-Hartley act, but union spokesmen said the men had voted not to ballot on the wage offer. In announcing the boycott, union spokesman said a September 2 maritime strike is certain.

What sub-type of article is it?

Economic Shipping

What keywords are associated?

Longshoremen Work Stoppage Coastwide Strike Maritime Labor Dispute San Francisco Waterfront Pacific Coast Ports

What entities or persons were involved?

James Kearney Frank P. Foise

Where did it happen?

San Francisco

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

San Francisco

Event Date

Sept. 2

Key Persons

James Kearney Frank P. Foise

Outcome

plans for coastwide strike on sept. 2; boycott of election on employers' wage offer; 24-hour work stoppage from 6 p.m. tomorrow until 6 p.m. wednesday; emergency gangs to service passenger ships.

Event Details

CIO longshoremen called a 24-hour waterfront work stoppage in San Francisco and planned a coastwide strike on Sept. 2. About 6,000 longshoremen work daily through the hiring hall. 75 delegates from Pacific coast ports concluded a caucus to speed preparations. Delegates voted to demand one uniform full day off each week, preferably Sunday, at San Francisco, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Portland, and Seattle. The stoppage allows attendance at a meeting on the deadlocked maritime labor dispute. Employers criticized it as unnecessary and demoralizing, noting similar interruption last Wednesday. Union to boycott NLRB election on wage offer per Taft-Hartley Act.

Are you sure?