Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
September 19, 1851
The Southern Press
Washington, District Of Columbia
What is this article about?
The editorial apologizes for delays in publications due to the senior editor's absence and colleague's illness. It endorses Hon. James K. Paulding's letter to the Southern Rights Association of South Carolina, praises its quality, and criticizes Southern 'submissionists' for alienating Northern supporters like Paulding.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
The absence of the senior editor of this paper, and the sickness of his colleague, for two months, must be the apology to our readers and correspondents, for any neglect or inadvertence they have experienced in reference to their letters or the selections. The latter have been confided to the clerk, who is not versed in Southern politics.
We publish to-day the letter of the Hon. James K. Paulding to the Southern Rights Association of South Carolina. It ought to have appeared several days ago, and would have appeared but for the circumstances above referred to. We endorse emphatically every word of this letter, and of the commentary by the Charleston Mercury. The South has acted in such a faltering and fratricidal manner as to sacrifice and prostrate almost every real friend she had in the North. Mr. Paulding stands almost solitary and alone in the constancy, ability, and courage with which he has supported the Constitution and the rights of the South—'faithful among the faithless.' His letter speaks for itself. It is one of the most able, cogent, lucid, elegant, and patriotic of all the productions to which the pending controversy has given birth. And we envy not the head or heart of the Southern submissionist, who can read it without a pang of remorse, or a blush of shame.
We publish to-day the letter of the Hon. James K. Paulding to the Southern Rights Association of South Carolina. It ought to have appeared several days ago, and would have appeared but for the circumstances above referred to. We endorse emphatically every word of this letter, and of the commentary by the Charleston Mercury. The South has acted in such a faltering and fratricidal manner as to sacrifice and prostrate almost every real friend she had in the North. Mr. Paulding stands almost solitary and alone in the constancy, ability, and courage with which he has supported the Constitution and the rights of the South—'faithful among the faithless.' His letter speaks for itself. It is one of the most able, cogent, lucid, elegant, and patriotic of all the productions to which the pending controversy has given birth. And we envy not the head or heart of the Southern submissionist, who can read it without a pang of remorse, or a blush of shame.
What sub-type of article is it?
Constitutional
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Southern Rights
Paulding Letter
Constitution
Submissionists
Northern Friends
Pending Controversy
What entities or persons were involved?
Hon. James K. Paulding
Southern Rights Association Of South Carolina
Charleston Mercury
Southern Submissionist
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Endorsement Of James K. Paulding's Letter Supporting Southern Rights
Stance / Tone
Strongly Pro Southern Rights And Critical Of Submissionists
Key Figures
Hon. James K. Paulding
Southern Rights Association Of South Carolina
Charleston Mercury
Southern Submissionist
Key Arguments
Apology For Publication Delays Due To Editor Absences
Endorsement Of Paulding's Letter And Charleston Mercury Commentary
South's Faltering Actions Have Alienated Northern Friends
Paulding's Solitary Support For Constitution And Southern Rights
Paulding's Letter Is Able, Cogent, Lucid, Elegant, And Patriotic
Shame To Southern Submissionists Who Read It Without Remorse