Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Daily State Sentinel
Story May 7, 1864

Daily State Sentinel

Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana

What is this article about?

Senate debates raising Assistant Attorney General Coffey's salary amid discrepancies in Assistant Secretaries' pay; Fessenden suggests $3,000 insufficient for stylish living, implying dishonesty; Johnson queries honesty; notes scandals among officials and female clerks. (Washington correspondence.)

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

How Assistant Secretaries Live.

[Washington Correspondence of N. Y. Commercial.]

While the Senate was discussing a motion to raise the salary of Assistant Attorney General Coffey from $3,000 to $4,000, Mr. Fessenden alluded to the discrepancy of the salaries now paid to Assistant Secretaries, and said that those who only received $3,000 would be satisfied with that if others received no more, although if a man wants to keep a couple of horses and a carriage, and live in style, he cannot live on $3,000 honestly, and some, he understood, did keep their carriages and horses. "Honestly!" inquired Reverdy Johnson, with a doubtful look. And Mr. Fessenden replied, significantly: "I do not know."

There are queer stories about some of our officials, and some of our female clerks are sadly sullied by scandal.

What sub-type of article is it?

Curiosity

What themes does it cover?

Social Manners Deception

What keywords are associated?

Assistant Secretaries Salaries Senate Discussion Official Scandals Dishonest Living

What entities or persons were involved?

Assistant Attorney General Coffey Mr. Fessenden Reverdy Johnson

Where did it happen?

Washington

Story Details

Key Persons

Assistant Attorney General Coffey Mr. Fessenden Reverdy Johnson

Location

Washington

Story Details

Senate discussion on raising Assistant Attorney General Coffey's salary from $3,000 to $4,000 highlights discrepancies in Assistant Secretaries' pay; Fessenden notes $3,000 insufficient for stylish living, implying some officials live dishonestly with carriages and horses; Johnson questions honesty; closing remark on scandals involving officials and female clerks.

Are you sure?