Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
December 30, 1805
Norfolk Gazette And Publick Ledger
Norfolk, Virginia
What is this article about?
The editor of the Ledger responds to a malicious publication in the Herald, denying authorship of 'A LAYMAN' and past offensive pieces, refuting false accusations, and explaining his reluctance to engage in such contests.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
If the Editor of this paper, were to permit his attention to be engaged in noticing all the abuse which political malice and private rancour could produce, he would of consequence neglect duties which have a stronger claim upon him. For this, and other reasons, he had resolved to disregard the attacks which he knew would be occasionally directed against him.
A publication in the Herald of Saturday, has induced him to depart from the rule which he had proscribed to himself, not that he supposes the publication can injure him personally, or the credit of his paper with any respectable honest character, and it is such, and such only, that he seeks to be respected by. Every one who knows the person that conducts the Herald, will acquit him of having any more agency in the publication referred to, than the types in his office. It proceeds from one of the same malignant characters which assailed the Editor, under the pretext of his having offended them by publications in the Ledger, at a time when they well knew that the present Editor had not the smallest concern in those publications. Mr. O'Connor, with a full share of malice, but without the talent for even abuse, very kindly lent his columns for the purpose of insult and invective, and which he had done in one instance even before the Editor of this paper commenced his editorial career.--Pursuing the same system, they affected to believe the Editor of this paper to be the author of the piece signed A LAYMAN, which he declares he is not.
It was written and published at the request of a very respectable friend, and not without some reluctance on the part of the Editor, because he was very certain what would be the consequence, for however superior we may feel to, and undeserving of calumny and abuse, no one of sensibility can be otherwise than disturbed by them. The Editor conceived that the circumstances demanded an insertion of a piece, the decency and modesty of which, will be admitted by every person of candour. The motives which have been ascribed to the Editor, are untrue, and irreconcilable with the tenour of his conduct in respect to the Herald. If the Editor of this paper had been disposed to depreciate the merit of the Herald, certainly he did not want occasions. He suffered to pass without notice, some of the most obscene publications that were ever presented to the publick thro' the columns of a newspaper. In short, the Editor of this paper did not wish to engage in a contest with persons, whose malignant prejudices, he knew would not be controuled by any regard to truth, delicacy, or even decency.
Although not connected with the present subject, the writer of the piece in the Herald, has affected to consider a censure of some other papers, as an attack upon the Herald, and has not hesitated to associate with abuse, direct falsehood. The Editor challenges him to produce any instance, wherein translations from any other paper, have been given to the publick, as made for the Ledger.
The Editor begs pardon of his readers for this intrusion, it is the first, and it shall be the last time that he will trespass the same way.
A publication in the Herald of Saturday, has induced him to depart from the rule which he had proscribed to himself, not that he supposes the publication can injure him personally, or the credit of his paper with any respectable honest character, and it is such, and such only, that he seeks to be respected by. Every one who knows the person that conducts the Herald, will acquit him of having any more agency in the publication referred to, than the types in his office. It proceeds from one of the same malignant characters which assailed the Editor, under the pretext of his having offended them by publications in the Ledger, at a time when they well knew that the present Editor had not the smallest concern in those publications. Mr. O'Connor, with a full share of malice, but without the talent for even abuse, very kindly lent his columns for the purpose of insult and invective, and which he had done in one instance even before the Editor of this paper commenced his editorial career.--Pursuing the same system, they affected to believe the Editor of this paper to be the author of the piece signed A LAYMAN, which he declares he is not.
It was written and published at the request of a very respectable friend, and not without some reluctance on the part of the Editor, because he was very certain what would be the consequence, for however superior we may feel to, and undeserving of calumny and abuse, no one of sensibility can be otherwise than disturbed by them. The Editor conceived that the circumstances demanded an insertion of a piece, the decency and modesty of which, will be admitted by every person of candour. The motives which have been ascribed to the Editor, are untrue, and irreconcilable with the tenour of his conduct in respect to the Herald. If the Editor of this paper had been disposed to depreciate the merit of the Herald, certainly he did not want occasions. He suffered to pass without notice, some of the most obscene publications that were ever presented to the publick thro' the columns of a newspaper. In short, the Editor of this paper did not wish to engage in a contest with persons, whose malignant prejudices, he knew would not be controuled by any regard to truth, delicacy, or even decency.
Although not connected with the present subject, the writer of the piece in the Herald, has affected to consider a censure of some other papers, as an attack upon the Herald, and has not hesitated to associate with abuse, direct falsehood. The Editor challenges him to produce any instance, wherein translations from any other paper, have been given to the publick, as made for the Ledger.
The Editor begs pardon of his readers for this intrusion, it is the first, and it shall be the last time that he will trespass the same way.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Press Attacks
Libel
Editorial Defense
Herald
O'connor
Malice
Calumny
What entities or persons were involved?
Editor Of This Paper
Herald
Mr. O'connor
A Layman
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Defense Against Libelous Attacks On The Editor
Stance / Tone
Defensive Refutation Of False Accusations
Key Figures
Editor Of This Paper
Herald
Mr. O'connor
A Layman
Key Arguments
Resolved To Disregard Most Attacks To Focus On Duties
Publication In Herald Not From Its Conductor But Malignant Characters
Denies Authorship Of Past Ledger Publications And 'A Layman'
Inserted 'A Layman' At Friend's Request Despite Anticipating Abuse
Motives Ascribed Are Untrue And Inconsistent With Conduct
Ignored Obscene Publications In Herald To Avoid Contest
Challenges Claim Of Presenting Others' Translations As Original