Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up freeDaily Cincinnati Republican
Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio
What is this article about?
A congressional member warns of a plot to hastily adjourn Congress on Monday, breaking quorum to defeat vital legislation, which would bring disgrace. Commentary deems it sneaky and unmanly, urging support for tariff bills and questioning Democratic motives on revenue and Tyler's administration.
OCR Quality
Full Text
We are requested, by a member of Congress who is entitled to our confidence and respect, to say something in deprecation of a design which he believes to exist, to defeat all salutary measures which remain to be perfected by Congress through hasty adjournment to an extent that will break up Congress on Monday next for want of a quorum: To state this apprehension, as we have done in his own language, will, we feel satisfied enough to defeat the purpose, if it exist. But we do not think he is misinformed. There is no class of men who will willingly incur the odium of participating in any such design, the success of which would cover the present Congress with deep and indelible disgrace. Nor would the individual constituents of such a class escape, each his share, of opprobrium, should Congress informally adjourn, leaving vitally important business undisposed of. But even a quorum is wanting.
We clip the above from the National Intelligencer of Friday last. It is appropriately headed. Any such attempt to defeat legislation, would be truly disgraceful, and we do not believe a sufficient number to accomplish this sneaking mode of defeating legislation, dare resort to it. If they cannot conscientiously unite with the honest portion of the Whigs it would be more manly, to join with Messrs. Adams, Arnold, Potts and the other politicians of the party, in their noble stand.
While on this subject, we would ask the initiated to vote for such a sort of tariff for revenue?
They have professed their willingness to vote for a tariff if the distribution clause were out. If they dislike the pending bill, why did they not sustain Ingersoll's proposition, or agree upon some other tariff for revenue? Are they too disposed "to head Captain Tyler" and "starve him into submission," by denying a revenue to his administration? Or, have they in reality abandoned the true Democratic doctrine as set forth by General Jackson in his letter to Dr. Coleman? Will the Globe explain, or the Enquirer enlighten us on this subject?
What sub-type of article is it?
What themes does it cover?
What keywords are associated?
What entities or persons were involved?
Where did it happen?
Story Details
Key Persons
Location
Congress
Event Date
Friday Last
Story Details
A member of Congress warns of a design to hastily adjourn on Monday next, breaking quorum to defeat salutary measures, bringing disgrace. Clipped from National Intelligencer; commentary calls it sneaking and unmanly, suggests joining Whigs like Adams et al., and questions Democratic refusal of tariff for revenue, possibly to undermine Tyler or abandon Jackson's doctrine.