Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
February 17, 1863
The Daily Manchester American
Manchester, Hillsboro County, New Hampshire
What is this article about?
Editorial advises parents to support teachers by enforcing pupil obedience in public schools, criticizes poor teacher selection and parental undermining of authority, emphasizing discipline for the child's benefit.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
Here is a text on which we wish to say a word to parents and those interested in our public schools. It is too often the case, in the first place that Committees make mistakes in the selection of teachers. It frequently happens that teachers have no sympathy with children, no patience with mere playfulness, no prudence in managing their pupils—teachers who work merely for the compensation and are happy only when relieved from the requirements of the school-room.
But on the other hand, it is the first duty of a pupil as it is of a soldier to obey. And it is the imperative duty of the parent to exact obedience to the commands of the teacher, so long as the child is required to attend the school. When the parent condemns the action of a teacher before his children, and believes that the child is wholly in the right and the teacher altogether wrong, or what is worse—what in fact is not only a violation of good order but of legal enactment,—when a parent encourages a child to disobedience, or to resistance, when he says "If I were a pupil I would not stand such treatment," he becomes himself the offender and should suffer the punishment which too frequently falls upon the innocent pupil.
Let us admonish parents not to urge their children to a course of conduct which will result not only in injury to the school, but which will inevitably prove a greater injury to the child.
But on the other hand, it is the first duty of a pupil as it is of a soldier to obey. And it is the imperative duty of the parent to exact obedience to the commands of the teacher, so long as the child is required to attend the school. When the parent condemns the action of a teacher before his children, and believes that the child is wholly in the right and the teacher altogether wrong, or what is worse—what in fact is not only a violation of good order but of legal enactment,—when a parent encourages a child to disobedience, or to resistance, when he says "If I were a pupil I would not stand such treatment," he becomes himself the offender and should suffer the punishment which too frequently falls upon the innocent pupil.
Let us admonish parents not to urge their children to a course of conduct which will result not only in injury to the school, but which will inevitably prove a greater injury to the child.
What sub-type of article is it?
Education
What keywords are associated?
Public Schools
Teacher Selection
Parental Duty
Pupil Obedience
School Discipline
What entities or persons were involved?
Parents
Teachers
Pupils
Committees
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Parental Enforcement Of Obedience To Teachers In Public Schools
Stance / Tone
Admonitory Towards Parents Undermining School Authority
Key Figures
Parents
Teachers
Pupils
Committees
Key Arguments
Committees Often Select Unsympathetic Teachers Lacking Patience And Prudence.
Pupils Must Obey Teachers As Their Primary Duty.
Parents Must Enforce Obedience To Teachers While Child Attends School.
Parents Who Criticize Teachers Before Children Or Encourage Disobedience Violate Order And Law.
Such Parental Actions Harm The School And The Child More Severely.
Parents Should Be Admonished Against Urging Rebellious Conduct.