Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Carroll Free Press
Editorial May 26, 1858

Carroll Free Press

Carrollton, Carroll County, Ohio

What is this article about?

An editorial forecasts the defeat of eight Ohio Democratic Congress members who supported the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution, highlighting their prior minority victories due to divided opposition votes, now unified against them.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

The members of Congress from Ohio who voted for the English-Lecompton swindle, will suffer a defeat this fall, in case they are candidates for re-election, that will be overwhelming. There were eight of them all told, and by scarcely any possibility, or state of things, can either of this number be re-elected. Their faithless ness as legislators would alone have compassed their defeat; but in addition to this the circumstances attending their first election are such that nothing but the direst overthrow stares them now in the face. This is manifest by referring to the returns in their respective districts two years since:

In the First Congressional district Pendleton (Lecompton Dem.) received 6133 votes, Taft (Rep.) 4256, Torrence (Am.) 2643, making a majority against Pendleton of 765.

In the Second district Groesbeck (Lecompton Dem.) received 5728 votes, Gurley (Rep.) 4343, Harrison (Am.) 3229, majority against Groesbeck 1831.

In the Sixth district Cockerill (Lecompton Dem.) had 8603 votes, Emrie (Rep.) 7460, Trimble (Am.) 1598, majority against Cockerill 455.

In the Ninth district Hall (Lecompton Dem.) had 9561, Watson (Rep.) 9382, Wilson (Am.) 271, majority against Hall 92.

In the Tenth district, Miller (Lecompton Dem.) had 7403, Hoffman (Rep.) 5633, Moore (Am.) 4326, majority against Miller 2551.

In the Twelfth district, Cox (Lecompton Dem.) had 8938, Galloway (Rep.) 8582, Stansbury (Am.) 817, majority against Cox 495.

In the Fifteenth district, Burns (Lecompton Dem.) had 9194, Sapp (Rep.) 9143, majority for Burns 51.

In the Seventeenth district, Lawrence (Lecompton Dem.) had 8085, Albright (Rep.) 6805, Davenport (Am.) 2013, majority against Lawrence 733.

It will thus be seen that every member of Congress from this State, excepting Burns, who voted to enslave the people of Kansas, was elected, not by a majority but by a minority vote. They succeeded alone because their opponents were silly enough to quarrel among themselves, to run two candidates, and thus measurably throw their votes away. This, we think, will not be the case this fall. In all of these Districts, so far as we can learn, dissensions in the opposition forces have been healed, the ranks are closing up, and the majority vote that was frittered away two years ago upon two candidates, will this fall be centered upon one, which will render his election morally certain.

What sub-type of article is it?

Partisan Politics Slavery Abolition

What keywords are associated?

Lecompton Swindle Ohio Congress Election Defeat Kansas Enslavement Minority Vote Opposition Unity

What entities or persons were involved?

Pendleton Taft Torrence Groesbeck Gurley Harrison Cockerill Emrie Trimble Hall Watson Wilson Miller Hoffman Moore Cox Galloway Stansbury Burns Sapp Lawrence Albright Davenport

Editorial Details

Primary Topic

Defeat Of Ohio Lecompton Democrats In Upcoming Election

Stance / Tone

Strongly Predictive Of Overwhelming Defeat For Lecompton Supporters

Key Figures

Pendleton Taft Torrence Groesbeck Gurley Harrison Cockerill Emrie Trimble Hall Watson Wilson Miller Hoffman Moore Cox Galloway Stansbury Burns Sapp Lawrence Albright Davenport

Key Arguments

Eight Ohio Congress Members Who Voted For English Lecompton Swindle Face Overwhelming Defeat They Were Elected By Minority Votes Two Years Ago Opposition Split Votes Between Republican And American Candidates Dissensions In Opposition Healed, Ranks Closing Up Majority Votes Will Center On One Candidate This Fall, Ensuring Election

Are you sure?