Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!
Sign up free
Editorial
May 26, 1802
The Recorder, Or, Lady's And Gentleman's Miscellany
Richmond, Virginia
What is this article about?
The Recorder newspaper responds to Mr. Duane, clarifying that defenses of Timothy Pickering published in it were not written by J.T. Callender but by a Virginian correspondent. It emphasizes its openness to both sides of political questions and requests Duane republish the explanation.
OCR Quality
98%
Excellent
Full Text
ANSWER TO MR. DUANE.
The successive defences of Timothy Pickering, that have appeared in the Recorder, were not wrote by J. T. Callender; but by a person who holds many opinions very different from his. The remarks were introduced with a cautionary note, in the first instance, that they came from a Virginian Correspondent; and, in the second instance, we brought them forward with a severe introductory censure upon the said Timothy. In this day's Recorder, the merit of Mr. Pickering is again defended, and attacked, by different writers. The Recorder is a paper open to both sides of the question, a kind of paper that has been much wanted, and that has hitherto been very favorably received by leading characters among the Republicans. We have sent Mr. Duane a copy of this number. We expect, as an act of justice, that he will republish this explanation. It is only by chance, when we see the Aurora; so that we should thank the editor for sending us a copy of the republication of this article, if he chooses to make one. But the ground which this paper has taken is already well understood by every person, in whose approbation, or censure, we can feel ourselves materially interested. We could not, if so disposed, do any harm to Mr. Duane; and he can, assuredly, do as little harm to us.
The successive defences of Timothy Pickering, that have appeared in the Recorder, were not wrote by J. T. Callender; but by a person who holds many opinions very different from his. The remarks were introduced with a cautionary note, in the first instance, that they came from a Virginian Correspondent; and, in the second instance, we brought them forward with a severe introductory censure upon the said Timothy. In this day's Recorder, the merit of Mr. Pickering is again defended, and attacked, by different writers. The Recorder is a paper open to both sides of the question, a kind of paper that has been much wanted, and that has hitherto been very favorably received by leading characters among the Republicans. We have sent Mr. Duane a copy of this number. We expect, as an act of justice, that he will republish this explanation. It is only by chance, when we see the Aurora; so that we should thank the editor for sending us a copy of the republication of this article, if he chooses to make one. But the ground which this paper has taken is already well understood by every person, in whose approbation, or censure, we can feel ourselves materially interested. We could not, if so disposed, do any harm to Mr. Duane; and he can, assuredly, do as little harm to us.
What sub-type of article is it?
Press Freedom
Partisan Politics
What keywords are associated?
Newspaper Dispute
Timothy Pickering Defense
Partisan Press
Recorder Impartiality
Mr. Duane
J. T. Callender
What entities or persons were involved?
Mr. Duane
Timothy Pickering
J. T. Callender
Recorder
Aurora
Virginian Correspondent
Republicans
Editorial Details
Primary Topic
Response To Mr. Duane On Defenses Of Timothy Pickering
Stance / Tone
Defensive And Impartial
Key Figures
Mr. Duane
Timothy Pickering
J. T. Callender
Recorder
Aurora
Virginian Correspondent
Republicans
Key Arguments
Defenses Of Pickering Not Written By Callender
Written By A Person With Different Opinions
Introduced With Cautionary Note From Virginian Correspondent
Recorder Open To Both Sides Of Questions
Favorably Received By Republicans
Request For Duane To Republish Explanation
No Harm Possible Between Papers