Thank you for visiting SNEWPapers!

Sign up free
Page thumbnail for Kansas City Daily Journal
Domestic News February 26, 1895

Kansas City Daily Journal

Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri

What is this article about?

Washington Senate Public Lands Committee abandons 'sooner' amendment by Senator Martin on Oklahoma lands due to protests, postponing it indefinitely despite advocacy by E. L. Dunn of Oklahoma City.

Clipping

OCR Quality

95% Excellent

Full Text

SOONER AMENDMENT ABANDONED.

Senate Public Lands Committee Decides Not to Report It.

Washington, Feb. 25.-(Special.) The senate committee on public lands decided to-day to not report the "sooner" amendment proposed by Senator Martin, for the sundry civil bill, concerning lands in Oklahoma. Sometime ago this amendment was acted upon favorably by the committee but, owing to the protests received from Oklahoma, it was recalled for further action which resulted in the proposed amendment being indefinitely postponed to-day. When the committee met Mr. E. L. Dunn, of Oklahoma City, was present, and made the statement to the committee that it was a very important amendment and he believed that the committee could gain much information about it if considered by congress. The plan suggested was followed. It was delayed until next congress.

What sub-type of article is it?

Politics

What keywords are associated?

Sooner Amendment Oklahoma Lands Senate Committee Public Lands Bill

What entities or persons were involved?

Senator Martin Mr. E. L. Dunn

Where did it happen?

Washington

Domestic News Details

Primary Location

Washington

Event Date

Feb. 25

Key Persons

Senator Martin Mr. E. L. Dunn

Outcome

the proposed amendment was indefinitely postponed and delayed until next congress

Event Details

The senate committee on public lands decided to-day to not report the "sooner" amendment proposed by Senator Martin, for the sundry civil bill, concerning lands in Oklahoma. Sometime ago this amendment was acted upon favorably by the committee but, owing to the protests received from Oklahoma, it was recalled for further action which resulted in the proposed amendment being indefinitely postponed to-day. When the committee met Mr. E. L. Dunn, of Oklahoma City, was present, and made the statement to the committee that it was a very important amendment and he believed that the committee could gain much information about it if considered by congress. The plan suggested was followed.

Are you sure?